Cited by 146Mental Health and PsychiatryMedical Research and PracticesHistorical Psychiatry and Medical Practices

Classification in psychiatry: ICD–10 versus DSM–IV

Open access
Andrews, Gavin, Slade, Tim, Peters, Lorna·1999·British Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Classification in psychiatry: ICD-I0 versus

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjp.174.1.3

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Slight differences in diagnostic criteria for research produced some differences in prevalence rates and correlates of mental disorders.

    “although the seemingly slight differences in diagnostic criteria for research did produce some differences in prevalence rates and correlates of mental disorders (9,10)”

    From The DSM-5: Classification and criteria changes (2013) · cites this paper as [10]

    The Results (page unavailable) report different diagnostic frequencies under ICD-10 and DSM-IV, including twice as many post-traumatic stress disorder cases under ICD-10 in the enriched sample. The paper links diagnostic differences to differing criteria, but our copy does not report differences in correlates of mental disorders. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [8]8. DSM -Ill -R. E M -IN and ICD-I0 diagnoses of alcohol use dlsorders. Drug and Akohd Dependence. 41.127-135. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.174.1 · DOI
  2. [9]9. 3 Published online by Cambridge University Press
  3. [13]13. L., W . T . & An&ews, G. (1998) A comparison of K D -I0 and DSM -N cnteria for post-traumatic stress disorder. Journal of Tmumot~c Stress, in press.
  4. [18]18. -(1993) The KD-I0 Classification of Me& ond Behouml C i d e r s -Diognostlc Orteno fw Research. Geneva: WHO. -(1997) Composite lnternotionol Dognostic lnterwew -Version 2.1. Geneva: WHO. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.174.1.3 Published online by Cambridge University Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Andrews, G., Slade, T., & Peters, L.
Affiliations
St Vincent's Hospital Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Andrews, Gavin
Venue
British Journal of Psychiatry
Published
1999-01
Volume
174
Issue
1
Pages
3-5
ISSN
  • 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-1465
OpenAlex
W2042988097
Cited by
145
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Medical Terminology › Medical Research and Practices
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices
Keywords
psychiatric classification, ICD-10, DSM-IV, diagnostic criteria, mental illness
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Humans, Interview, Psychological, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review