The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Review of community prevalence of depression in later life
Abstract
Background: Despite considerable interest, there is no consensus regarding the prevalence of depression in later life. Aims: To assess the prevalence of late-life depression in the community. Method: A systematic review of community-based studies of the prevalence of depression in later life (55+). Literature was analysed by level of caseness at which depression was defined and measured. Results: Thirty-four studies eligible for inclusion were found. The reported prevalence rates vary enormously (0.4–35%). Arranged according to level of caseness, major depression is relatively rare among the elderly (weighted average prevalence 1.8%), minor depression is more common (weighted average prevalence 9.8%), while all depressive syndromes deemed clinically relevant yield an average prevalence of 13.5%. There is consistent evidence for higher prevalence rates for women and among older people living under adverse socio-economic circumstances. Conclusions: Depression is common in later life. Methodological differences between studies preclude firm conclusions about cross-cultural and geographical variation. Improving the comparability of epidemiological research constitutes an important step forward.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Robins, L. N. (1981) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1981.01780290015001 · Cited by 5,219
The Functioning and Well-being of Depressed Patients: Results From the Medical Outcomes Study
Wells, K. B. (1989) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1989.03430070062031 · Cited by 2,130 · cited 1×
“It is associated with a decline in both well-being and daily functioning (Wells et al, 1989; Gurland, 1992; Ormel et al, 1994) and with higher risks of functional impairment, mortality and service utilisation (Gurland et al, 1983; Burvill & Hall, 1994; Beekman et al, 1997~).”
BackgroundSocial Support and the Outcome of Major Depression
George, L. K., Blazer, D. G., Hughes, D. C., & Fowler, N. (1989) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.154.4.478 · Cited by 732
Cited by
Frequency of Depression After Stroke: A Systematic Review of Observational Studies
Hackett, M. L., Yapa, C., Parag, V., & Anderson, C. S. (2005) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.0000165928.19135.35 · Cited by 1,464
Mental Illness and Mental Health: The Two Continua Model Across the Lifespan
Westerhof, G. J., & Keyes, C. L. M. (2010) · Journal of Adult Development · doi:10.1007/s10804-009-9082-y · Cited by 1,345
Management of Depression in Older Adults: A Review
Kok, R. M., & Reynolds, C. F. (2017) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2017.5706 · Cited by 890
Luppa, M., Sikorski, C., Luck, T., Ehreke, L., Konnopka, A., Wiese, B., Weyerer, S., König, H.-H., & Riedel-Heller, S. G. (2012) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2010.11.033 · Cited by 855
Kuehner, C. (2003) · Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica · doi:10.1034/j.1600-0447.2003.00204.x · Cited by 839
Metadata
- Authors
- Beekman, A. T. F., Copeland, J., & Prince, M. J.
- Venue
- British Journal of Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Royal College of Psychiatrists
- Published
- 1999-04
- Volume
- 174
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 307-311
- ISSN
- 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
- 1472-1465
- OpenAlex
- W1987544980
- Cited by
- 1,144
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 39.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.