Cited by 839Mental Health Treatment and AccessSex and Gender in HealthcareTreatment of Major Depression

Gender differences in unipolar depression: an update of epidemiological findings and possible explanations

Kuehner, C.·2003·Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica

Abstract

Objective: To give an update on epidemiological findings on sex differences in the prevalence of unipolar depression and putative risk factors. Material and methods: Systematic review of the literature. Results: Recent epidemiological research yields additional evidence for a female preponderance in unipolar depression, holding true across different cultural settings. Current explanations include artefacts, genetic, hormonal, psychological and psychosocial risk factors. Rather consistently, intrapsychic and psychosocial gender role related risk factors have been identified which may contribute to the higher depression risk in women. Gender role aspects are also reflected in endocrine stress reactions and possibly influence associated neuropsychological processes. Conclusion: There is a need for more integrative models taking into account psychological, psychosocial, and macrosocial risk factors as well as their interactions, which also connect these factors with physiological and endocrine responses. Furthermore, it is conceivable that across the life span, as well as across cultural settings, individual risk factors will add with varying emphasis to the higher prevalence of depression in women.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1034/j.1600-0447.2003.00204.x

Cites

128 of 128 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kuehner, C.
Affiliations
Central Institute of Mental Health (DE)
Corresponding author
Kuehner, C.
Venue
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-07-31
Volume
108
Issue
3
Pages
163-174
ISSN
  • 0001-690X (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0447
OpenAlex
W2011334992
Cited by
839
References
128
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 56 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 59 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 43 · 2014: 40 · 2013: 46 · 2012: 50
FWCI
1.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Sex and Gender in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
major depressive disorder, sex differences, gender differences, prevalence, risk factors, psychosocial risk factors, gender roles, hormonal factors, endocrine stress response, women's mental health, cross-cultural comparison
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Animals, Depressive Disorder, Female, Gender Identity, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Sex Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review