Cited by 326Schizophrenia research and treatmentPsychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual OffendingMental Health and Psychiatry

Predicting schizophrenia: findings from the Edinburgh High-Risk Study

Open access
Johnstone, Eve C., Ebmeier, Klaus P., Miller, Patrick, Owens, David G. C., Lawrie, Stephen M.·2005·British Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: The hypothesis that schizophrenia is neurodevelopmental was investigated in a prospective study of young people with a postulated 10–15% risk for the development of schizophrenia. Aims: To determine premorbid variables distinguishing high-risk people who will go on to develop schizophrenia from those who will not. Method: A high-risk sample of 163 young adults with two relatives with schizophrenia was recruited. They and 36 controls were serially examined. Baseline measures were compared between those who did develop schizophrenia, a well control group, a well high-risk group and high-risk participants with partial or isolated psychotic symptoms. Results: Of those at high risk, 20 developed schizophrenia within 2½ years. More experienced isolated or partial psychotic symptoms. Those who developed schizophrenia differed from those who did not on social anxiety, withdrawal and other schizotypal features. The whole high-risk sample differed from the control group on developmental and neuropsychological variables. Conclusions: The genetic component of schizophrenia affects many more individuals than will develop the illness, and partial impairment can be found in them. Highly significant predictors of the development of schizophrenia are detectable years before onset.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjp.186.1.18

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Familial vulnerability (along with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome) represents the most implementable target for selective screening intervention in health care.

    “Overall, familial vulnerability (along with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome) represents the most implementable target for selective screening intervention in health care 133 : it is more established for psychosis 134 , but it is emerging for bipolar disorder.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Johnstone, E. C., Ebmeier, K. P., Miller, P., Owens, D. G. C., & Lawrie, S. M.
Affiliations
  • Royal Edinburgh Hospital (GB)
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
Corresponding author
Johnstone, Eve C.
Venue
British Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2005-01
Volume
186
Issue
1
Pages
18-25
ISSN
  • 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-1465
OpenAlex
W2171607960
Cited by
326
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 26
FWCI
13.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
Keywords
schizophrenia, high-risk families, neurodevelopmental hypothesis, familial risk, social anxiety, withdrawal, schizotypy, genetic susceptibility, young adults
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Analysis of Variance, Brain, Child Behavior Disorders, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Prospective Studies, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Schizophrenia, Social Behavior, Case-Control Studies, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review