Cited by 24Schizophrenia research and treatmentPsychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionMental Health and Psychiatry

Effects of sub-clinical psychosis and cognitive insight on psychological well-being: A structural equation model

Weintraub, Marc J., Weisman de Mamani, Amy·2015·Psychiatry Research

Abstract

Psychological well-being has been widely researched along the psychosis spectrum, and increased psychotic symptoms are generally associated with worse well-being. Additionally, the construct of insight has been extensively studied in schizophrenia. While having greater insight has many benefits for those with schizophrenia, a paradox exists in which greater insight is also associated with poorer psychological well-being. However, it is unclear whether the link between insight and poor well-being occurs only once serious psychopathology has been established, or whether this is a more universal process seen even at lower levels on the psychosis spectrum. We used a structural modeling approach in an ethnically diverse, non-clinical sample of 420 undergraduates to evaluate the association between sub-clinical psychosis, cognitive insight and psychological well-being. As hypothesized, results indicated that sub-clinical psychotic symptoms were negatively associated with psychological well-being. The insight paradox was also substantiated, as greater cognitive insight was associated with worse psychological well-being. However, cognitive insight did not moderate the association between symptoms and well-being. The link between sub-clinical psychotic symptoms and psychological well-being as well as the insight paradox appears to emerge even before reaching threshold for a psychotic disorder. Research and clinical implications are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psychres.2014.12.039

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Weintraub, M. J., & Weisman de Mamani, A.
Affiliations
University of Miami (US)
Corresponding author
Weintraub, Marc J.
Venue
Psychiatry Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-03
Volume
226
Issue
1
Pages
149-155
ISSN
0165-1781 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2091423647
Cited by
24
References
61
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
1.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychiatry Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
Keywords
cognitive insight, psychological well-being, psychosis spectrum, psychotic symptoms, schizophrenia
MeSH terms
Adult, Awareness, Cognition, Female, Humans, Male, Personal Satisfaction, Psychotic Disorders, Models, Statistical, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review