Cited by 55Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Distress in Parkinson’s disease: contributions of disease factors and metacognitive style

Open access
Allott, Rory, Wells, Adrian, Morrison, Anthony P., Walker, Richard·2005·British Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Research has suggested that the high levels of depression and anxiety observed in Parkinson's disease are a primary consequence of its pathophysiology. This study aimed to test the hypothesis that a psychological factor, metacognitive style, is significantly associated with distress, independent of previously identified disease-related risk factors. Distress, metacognitive style and disease factors were assessed in 44 people with a diagnosis of Parkinson's disease. People with a specific metacognitive style had an increased vulnerability to distress over and above previously identified disease factors; this suggests future directions for the development of psychological interventions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjp.187.2.182

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ten of the thirteen included papers conducted hierarchical regressions evaluating which metacognitive beliefs subscales were independent predictors of anxiety, depression, and/or overall distress.

    “Ten of the thirteen included papers [41, 45–47, 49, 50, 52, 53, 58, 61] conducted hierarchical regressions evaluating which metacognitive beliefs subscales were independent predictors of anxiety, depression, and/or overall distress.”

    From Metacognitive beliefs and their relationship with anxiety and depression in physical illnesses: A systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as [49]

    The Statistical methods section says the study used hierarchical regression to test whether metacognitive style predicted distress independently of disease factors. The Metacognitive style and distress section says a second multiple regression used direct entry and forward selection to identify the MCQ subscale that best predicted distress. Thus this paper supports the claim that it examined subscale predictors, but it does not describe that subscale analysis as a hierarchical regression. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The most common measure of psychological distress was the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), used in nine studies.

    “The most common measure of psychological distress was the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS; [48]), which was used in nine studies [41, 45–47, 49–53].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Allott, R. (2002) Visual Hallucinations in Parkinson's Visual Hallucinations in Parkinson's Disease: Contributions of Cognitive Impairment and Disease: Contributions of Cognitive Impairment and Metacognitive Style Metacognitive Style. ClinPsyD thesis, University of . ClinPsyD thesis, University of Manchester, UK.
  2. B. A. Mueller), , 4th edn (ed. B. A. Mueller), pp.1^41. Kansas City, KS: ACCP. pp.1^41. Kansas City, KS: ACCP.
  3. S.Ruggieri), pp. 3^12.Philadelphia,PA:Lippincott ^Raven.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Allott, R., Wells, A., Morrison, A. P., & Walker, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Manchester (GB)
  • Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
Allott, Rory
Venue
British Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2005-08
Volume
187
Issue
2
Pages
182-183
ISSN
  • 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-1465
OpenAlex
W2035533779
Cited by
55
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Parkinson's UK
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
Parkinson's disease, distress, depression, anxiety, psychological vulnerability, psychological intervention
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anxiety, Cognition, Depression, Humans, Middle Aged, Parkinson Disease, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Stress, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review