Cited by 454Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchDisaster Response and ManagementDisaster Management and Resilience

Psychological distress and psychiatric disorder after natural disasters: systematic review and meta-analysis

Open access
Beaglehole, Ben, Mulder, Roger T., Frampton, Chris M., Boden, Joseph M., Newton-Howes, Giles, Bell, Caroline J.·2018·The British Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: Natural disasters are increasing in frequency and severity. They cause widespread hardship and are associated with detrimental effects on mental health. Aims: Our aim is to provide the best estimate of the effects of natural disasters on mental health through a systematic review and meta-analysis of the rates of psychological distress and psychiatric disorder after natural disasters. Method: This systematic review and meta-analysis is limited to studies that met predetermined quality criteria. We required included studies to make comparisons with pre-disaster or non-disaster exposed controls, and sample representative populations. Key studies were identified through a comprehensive search of PubMed, EMBASE and PsycINFO from 1980 to 3 March 2017. Random effects meta-analyses were performed for studies that reported key outcomes with appropriate statistics. Results: Forty-one studies were identified by the literature search, of which 27 contributed to the meta-analyses. Continuous measures of psychological distress were increased after natural disasters (combined standardised mean difference 0.63, 95% CI 0.27–0.98, P = 0.005). Psychiatric disorders were also increased (combined odds ratio 1.84, 95% CI 1.43–2.38, P < 0.001). Rates of post-traumatic stress disorder and depression were significantly increased after disasters. Findings for anxiety and alcohol misuse/dependence were not significant. High rates of heterogeneity suggest that disaster-specific factors and, to a lesser degree, methodological factors contribute to the variance between studies. Conclusions: Increased rates of psychological distress and psychiatric disorders follow natural disasters. High levels of heterogeneity between studies suggest that disaster variables and post-disaster response have the potential to mitigate adverse effects. Declaration of interest: None.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjp.2018.210

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Prior research on first responders to disasters and pandemics reports more anxiety, depression, acute stress, post-traumatic stress, and moral injury.

    “Studies of first responders to previous disasters and pandemics (e.g., 9/11, SARS, MERS) suggest high rates of anxiety, depression, acute and post-traumatic stress reactions, and moral injury [[11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16]].”

    From Supporting the well-being of health care providers during the COVID-19 pandemic: The CopeColumbia response (2020) · cites this paper as [11]

    The Discussion (page not provided) reports higher psychological distress and psychiatric disorder after natural disasters, including significant increases in PTSD and depression measures. But the review concerns disaster-exposed populations, not specifically first responders or pandemics; it does not support the moral-injury or acute-stress claims, and its increase in anxiety was not statistically significant. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Several systematic and scoping reviews have identified LMIC-specific evidence supporting negative mental health outcomes associated with climate change and climate-related disasters.

    “Several systematic and scoping reviews have identified LMIC-specific evidence supporting the various negative mental health outcomes associated with climate change and climate-related disasters [6,14,15,16].”
  • Similar reviews have identified comparable trends.

    “Notably, similar reviews have identified comparable trends.19 93”
  • In a global meta-analysis, Beaglehole and colleagues reported a significant increase in postnatural disaster mental disorder outcomes (OR 1.84, 95% CI 1.43 to 2.38, p<0.001, n=6 studies).

    “For example, in a global meta-analysis Beaglehole and colleagues93 reported a significant increase in postnatural disaster mental disorder outcomes (OR 1.84, 95% CI 1.43 to 2.38, p<0.001, n=6 studies).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 42 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [15]15. Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I, Williamson GD, Rennie D, et al. Meta- analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA 2000; 283: 2008-12.
  2. [16]16. Veritas Health Innovation. Covidence Systematic Review Software. (www. covidence.org/home.)
  3. [18]18. Nordic Cochrane Centre TCC. Review Manager (RevMan). 5.3. Copenhagen. 2014. (https://community.cochrane.org/help/tools-and-software/revman-5/ revman-5-download.)
  4. [34]34. Aslam N, Tarq N. Trauma, depression, anxiety, and stress among individuals living in earthquake affected and unaffected areas. Pak J Psychol Res 2010; 25: 131-48.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Beaglehole, B., Mulder, R. T., Frampton, C. M., Boden, J. M., Newton-Howes, G., & Bell, C. J.
Affiliations
University of Otago (NZ)
Corresponding author
Beaglehole, Ben
Venue
The British Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2018-10-10
Volume
213
Issue
6
Pages
716-722
ISSN
  • 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-1465
OpenAlex
W2897769394
Cited by
454
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 57 · 2025: 74 · 2024: 75 · 2023: 62 · 2022: 73 · 2021: 65 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1
FWCI
4.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Disaster Response and Management
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disaster Management and Resilience
Keywords
natural disasters, psychological distress, mental illness, post-traumatic stress disorder, depression, anxiety, alcohol abuse, disaster mental health, disaster response
MeSH terms
Natural Disasters, Alcoholism, Anxiety Disorders, Depressive Disorder, Humans, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review