Cited by 87Cardiac Health and Mental HealthCardiovascular Health and Risk FactorsMental Health Treatment and Access

An attempt to explain the bidirectional association between ischaemic heart disease, stroke and depression: a cohort and meta-analytic approach

Open access
Wium-Andersen, Marie Kim, Wium-Andersen, Ida Kim, Prescott, Eva Irene Bosano, Overvad, Kim, Jørgensen, Martin Balslev, Osler, Merete·2020·The British Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: Depression and cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are common diseases and associated in a bidirectional manner. Aims: To examine whether a bidirectional association between CVD and depression could be explained by shared risk factors, misclassification of disease measures or non-response. Method: A total of 10 population-based cohorts including 93 076 men and women (mean age 54.4 years, s.d. = 9.2) and an additional 10 510 men (mean age 51.2 years, s.d. = 0.3) were followed for subsequent depression, ischaemic heart disease (IHD) and stroke in the Danish National Patient Registry from health examinations between 1982 and 2015 and until end of follow-up in 2017–2018. Exposures were physicians’ diagnoses of IHD, stroke, depression or self-reported chest pain, depression, use of antidepressant medication and the Major Depression Inventory at the time of study entry in the Metropolit study. Associations were analysed using Cox proportional hazard regression with disease as time-dependent variables. Results: IHD and stroke were associated with subsequent depression (hazard ratio (HR) for IHD: 1.79, 95% CI 1.43–2.23 and HR for stroke: 2.62, 95% CI 2.09–3.29) and the associations were present in both men and women. Adjustment for the shared risk factors socioeconomic status, lifestyle, body mass index, statin use and serum lipids did not change the risk estimates. Furthermore, depression was associated with higher risk of subsequent IHD (HR = 1.63, 95% CI 1.36–1.95) and stroke (HR = 1.94, 95% CI 1.63–2.30). The associations were also present when the analyses were based on self-reported disease measures or restricted to include non-responders. Conclusions: The bidirectional association between CVD and depression was not explained by shared risk factors, misclassification or non-response.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjp.2019.130

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wium-Andersen, M. K., Wium-Andersen, I. K., Prescott, E. I. B., Overvad, K., Jørgensen, M. B., & Osler, M.
Affiliations
  • Frederiksberg Hospital (DK)
  • Aarhus University (DK)
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
Venue
The British Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2019-06-10
Volume
217
Issue
2
Pages
434-441
ISSN
  • 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-1465
OpenAlex
W2949770354
Cited by
87
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 2
FWCI
1.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
  • VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Hjerteforeningen
  • Lundbeckfonden (R155-2013-14070, R231-2016-2550, 7-11-0213)
  • TrygFonden (7‐11‐0213, R155-2013-14070)
  • H. Lundbeck A/S
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
depression, ischemic heart disease, stroke, bidirectional relationship, cardiovascular disease, shared risk factors, misclassification, nonresponse, antidepressants, chest pain, socioeconomic status, body mass index, statin use, serum lipids, Major Depression Inventory
MeSH terms
Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Cohort Studies, Proportional Hazards Models, Myocardial Ischemia, Stroke

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review