The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Accuracy of dopaminergic imaging as a biomarker for mild cognitive impairment with Lewy bodies
Open accessAbstract
Background: Dopaminergic imaging is an established biomarker for dementia with Lewy bodies, but its diagnostic accuracy at the mild cognitive impairment (MCI) stage remains uncertain. Aims: To provide robust prospective evidence of the diagnostic accuracy of dopaminergic imaging at the MCI stage to either support or refute its inclusion as a biomarker for the diagnosis of MCI with Lewy bodies. Method: We conducted a prospective diagnostic accuracy study of baseline dopaminergic imaging with [ 123 I] N -ω-fluoropropyl-2β-carbomethoxy-3β-(4-iodophenyl)nortropane single-photon emission computerised tomography ( 123 I-FP-CIT SPECT) in 144 patients with MCI. Images were rated as normal or abnormal by a panel of experts with access to striatal binding ratio results. Follow-up consensus diagnosis based on the presence of core features of Lewy body disease was used as the reference standard. Results: At latest assessment (mean 2 years) 61 patients had probable MCI with Lewy bodies, 26 possible MCI with Lewy bodies and 57 MCI due to Alzheimer's disease. The sensitivity of baseline FP-CIT visual rating for probable MCI with Lewy bodies was 66% (95% CI 52–77%), specificity 88% (76–95%) and accuracy 76% (68–84%), with positive likelihood ratio 5.3. Conclusions: It is over five times as likely for an abnormal scan to be found in probable MCI with Lewy bodies than MCI due to Alzheimer's disease. Dopaminergic imaging appears to be useful at the MCI stage in cases where Lewy body disease is suspected clinically.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In 144 patients with MCI, FP-CIT scans are 76% accurate (sensitivity 66%, specificity 88%) for probable MCI-DLB.
“Regarding early diagnosis, a study in 144 patients with MCI showed that that FP-CIT scans are 76% accurate (sensitivity 66%, specificity 88%) for probable MCI-DLB suggesting that dopaminergic imaging is useful at the MCI stage where LBD is suspected [151].”
From The use of neuroimaging techniques in the early and differential diagnosis of dementia (2023) · cites this paper as [151]
Dopaminergic imaging is useful at the MCI stage where LBD is suspected.
“Regarding early diagnosis, a study in 144 patients with MCI showed that that FP-CIT scans are 76% accurate (sensitivity 66%, specificity 88%) for probable MCI-DLB suggesting that dopaminergic imaging is useful at the MCI stage where LBD is suspected [151].”
From The use of neuroimaging techniques in the early and differential diagnosis of dementia (2023) · cites this paper as [151]
Citations
Cites
NIA‐AA Research Framework: Toward a biological definition of Alzheimer's disease
Jack, C. R., Bennett, D. A., Blennow, K., Carrillo, M. C., Dunn, B., Haeberlein, S. B., Holtzman, D. M., Jagust, W., Jessen, F., Karlawish, J., et al. (2018) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2018.02.018 · Cited by 10,537
Mioshi, E., Dawson, K., Mitchell, J., Arnold, R., & Hodges, J. R. (2006) · International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/gps.1610 · Cited by 2,016
Autopsy validation of 123 I-FP-CIT dopaminergic neuroimaging for the diagnosis of DLB
Thomas, A. J., Attems, J., Colloby, S. J., O'Brien, J. T., McKeith, I., Walker, R., Lee, L., Burn, D., Lett, D. J., & Walker, Z. (2017) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000003512 · Cited by 165
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 34
- 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30153-X · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/sleep/14.6.540 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1186/2051-5960-1-65 · DOI
- 10.1002/1531-8257(200005)15:3<503::AID-MDS1013>3.0.CO;2-V · DOI
- 10.1001/archneur.61.6.919 · DOI
- 10.1212/WNL.44.12.2308 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/h0044509 · DOI
- 10.1192/bjp.140.6.566 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/ana.24481 · DOI
- 10.1002/mdc3.12479 · DOI
- 10.1212/WNL.0000000000004058 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0028-3932(67)90015-2 · DOI
- 10.1001/archneur.58.6.977 · DOI
- 10.1192/bjp.177.3.252 · DOI
- 10.1002/mds.22340 · DOI · Paper page
- Rey, 1964, L'examen clinique en psychologie
- 10.1007/s00259-016-3466-6 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.nicl.2018.09.012 · DOI
- 10.1093/geront/9.3_Part_1.179 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s12350-015-0170-z · DOI
- 10.1212/WNL.0000000000009323 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.sleep.2010.12.009 · DOI
- 10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70057-1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1212/WNL.54.5.1050 · DOI
- 10.1097/MNM.0000000000001024 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0033291718000995 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.008 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/fampra/11.3.260 · DOI
- Firbank, 2013, Testing visual perception in dementia with Lewy bodies and Alzheimer disease, Am J Geriatr Psychiatry, 21, 501, 10.1016/j.jagp.2012.11.015 · DOI
- 10.1007/s12350-019-01887-6 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jagp.2013.01.072 · DOI
- McKenna, 2007, Graded Naming Test: Object Picture Book
- 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2018.12.001 · DOI
- Donaghy, Mild cognitive impairment with Lewy bodies: neuropsychiatric supportive symptoms and cognitive profile, Psychol Med
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The use of neuroimaging techniques in the early and differential diagnosis of dementia
Chouliaras, L., & O’Brien, J. T. (2023) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-023-02215-8 · Cited by 221
“%) for probable MCI-DLB suggesting that dopaminergic imaging is useful at the MCI stage where LBD is suspected [151].”
BackgroundSelf-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Roberts, G., Donaghy, P. C., Lloyd, J., Durcan, R., Petrides, G., Colloby, S. J., Lawley, S., Ciafone, J., Hamilton, C. A., Firbank, M., Allan, L., Barnett, N., Barker, S., Olsen, K., Howe, K., Ali, T., Taylor, J.-P., O'Brien, J., & Thomas, A. J.
- Affiliations
- Royal Victoria Infirmary (GB)
- Newcastle University (GB)
- University of Exeter (GB)
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Roberts, Gemma
- ORCID
- Venue
- The British Journal of Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Royal College of Psychiatrists
- Published
- 2020-12-23
- Volume
- 218
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 276-282
- ISSN
- 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
- 1472-1465
- OpenAlex
- W3095209702
- Cited by
- 41
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7
- FWCI
- 3.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Open Research Exeter (University of Exeter) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion)
- Apollo
- Funders
- Alzheimer's Society
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (CL-2016-01-007)
- University of Exeter
- Newcastle University
- Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
- NIHR Newcastle Biomedical Research Centre (ARUK-PG2015-13)
- NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- dopaminergic imaging, mild cognitive impairment, Lewy bodies, dementia with Lewy bodies, 123I-FP-CIT SPECT, diagnostic accuracy, biomarkers, Alzheimer's disease, striatal binding ratio, visual rating, Lewy body disease
- MeSH terms
- Alzheimer Disease, Humans, Prospective Studies, Biomarkers, Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon, Lewy Body Disease, Cognitive Dysfunction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review