The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Risk for depression and neural responses to fearful facial expressions of emotion
Open accessAbstract
Background: Depression is associated with neural abnormalities in emotional processing. Aims: This study explored whether these abnormalities underlie risk for depression. Method: We compared the neural responses of volunteers who were at high and low-risk for the development of depression (by virtue of high and low neuroticism scores; high-N group and low-N group respectively) during the presentation of fearful and happy faces using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Results: The high-N group demonstrated linear increases in response in the right fusiform gyrus and left middle temporal gyrus to expressions of increasing fear, whereas the low-N group demonstrated the opposite effect. The high-N group also displayed greater responses in the right amygdala, cerebellum, left middle frontal and bilateral parietal gyri to medium levels of fearful v. happy expressions. Conclusions: Risk for depression is associated with enhanced neural responses to fearful facial expressions similar to those observed in acute depression.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Similarly, people vulnerable to depression via the personality trait of neuroticism show enhanced amygdala responses to fearful faces (Chan et al., 2009), disrupted coupling of amygdala and ACC in response to emotional faces (Cremers et al., 2010) and abnormal patterns of ACC response during categorisation and memory of negative words (Chan et al., 2008).”
From Affective Cognition and its Disruption in Mood Disorders (2011) · cites this paper as Chan et al., 2009
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An inventory for measuring depression
BECK, A. T. (1961) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1961.01710120031004 · Cited by 38,032
Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL
Smith, S. M., Jenkinson, M., Woolrich, M. W., Beckmann, C. F., Behrens, T. E. J., Johansen-Berg, H., Bannister, P. R., De Luca, M., Drobnjak, I., Flitney, D. E., et al. (2004) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.051 · Cited by 13,630
Jenkinson, M., Bannister, P., Brady, M., & Smith, S. (2002) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.2002.1132 · Cited by 11,888
Fast robust automated brain extraction
Smith, S. M. (2002) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.10062 · Cited by 10,496
Talairach, J., Tournoux, P., & Rayport, M. (1988) · Thieme eBooks · Cited by 5,058
Ekman, P. (1976) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 4,345
Understanding face recognition
Bruce, V., & Young, A. (1986) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1986.tb02199.x · Cited by 4,067
A revised version of the Psychoticism scale
Eysenck, S. B. G., Eysenck, H. J., & Barrett, P. (1985) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/0191-8869(85)90026-1 · Cited by 3,094
Temporal Autocorrelation in Univariate Linear Modeling of FMRI Data
Woolrich, M. W., Ripley, B. D., Brady, M., & Smith, S. M. (2001) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.2001.0931 · Cited by 2,859
Assessing the significance of focal activations using their spatial extent
Friston, K. J., Worsley, K. J., Frackowiak, R. S. J., Mazziotta, J. C., & Evans, A. C. (1994) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.460010306 · Cited by 1,907
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Talairach, 1988, Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain: Three-dimensional Proportional System
- Spielberger, 1970, STAI Manual
- Spitzer, 1995, Structural Clinical Interview for the DSM–IV (SCID–I/P), Version II
- Nelson, 1982, National Adult Reading Test (NART) Test Manual
- Patenaude, 2007, Bayesian Shape and Appearance Models
- Surgladze, 2004, Recognition accuracy and response bias to happy and sad facial expressions in patients with major depression, Neuropsychology, 18
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Bayesian model of shape and appearance for subcortical brain segmentation
Patenaude, B., Smith, S. M., Kennedy, D. N., & Jenkinson, M. (2011) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.02.046 · Cited by 2,287
Cognitive Mechanisms of Treatment in Depression
Roiser, J. P., Elliott, R., & Sahakian, B. J. (2012) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/npp.2011.183 · Cited by 535
Affective Cognition and its Disruption in Mood Disorders
Elliott, R., Zahn, R., Deakin, J. F. W., & Anderson, I. M. (2011) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/npp.2010.77 · Cited by 330
Prenatal maternal depression alters amygdala functional connectivity in 6-month-old infants
Qiu, A., Anh, T. T., Li, Y., Chen, H., Rifkin-Graboi, A., Broekman, B. F. P., Kwek, K., Saw, S.-M., Chong, Y.-S., Gluckman, P. D., et al. (2015) · Translational Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/tp.2015.3 · Cited by 282
The biological and psychological basis of neuroticism: Current status and future directions
Ormel, J., Bastiaansen, J. A., Riese, H., Bos, E. H., Servaas, M. N., Ellenbogen, M. A., Rosmalen, J. G. M., & Aleman, A. (2012) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.09.004 · Cited by 288
Metadata
- Authors
- Chan, S. W. Y., Norbury, R., Goodwin, G. M., & Harmer, C. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Harmer, Catherine J.
- Venue
- British Journal of Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Royal College of Psychiatrists
- Published
- 2009-02
- Volume
- 194
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 139-145
- ISSN
- 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
- 1472-1465
- OpenAlex
- W2132797873
- Cited by
- 117
- References
- 49
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 13.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Eli Lilly and Company
- AstraZeneca
- Sanofi
- Stanley Medical Research Institute
- University of Oxford
- Eisai
- Servier
- H. Lundbeck A/S (P1vital)
- Medical Research Council
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
- Keywords
- depression risk, neuroticism, fearful faces, emotional face processing, amygdala, fusiform gyrus, middle temporal gyrus, cerebellum
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Amygdala, Cerebral Cortex, Depressive Disorder, Emotions, Facial Expression, Fear, Female, Humans, Functional Laterality, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Personality Assessment, Risk Factors, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review