Cited by 74Psychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsPatient-Provider Communication in HealthcareSchizophrenia research and treatment

Training to enhance psychiatrist communication with patients with psychosis (TEMPO): cluster randomised controlled trial

Open access
McCabe, Rose, John, Paula, Dooley, Jemima, Healey, Patrick, Cushing, Annie, Kingdon, David, Bremner, Stephen, Priebe, Stefan·2016·British Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: A better therapeutic relationship predicts better outcomes. However, there is no trial-based evidence on how to improve therapeutic relationships in psychosis. Aims: To test the effectiveness of communication training for psychiatrists on improving shared understanding and the therapeutic relationship (trial registration: ISRCTN94846422). Method: In a cluster randomised controlled trial in the UK, 21 psychiatrists were randomised. Ninety-seven (51% of those approached) out-patients with schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder were recruited, and 64 (66% of the sample recruited at baseline) were followed up after 5 months. The intervention group received four group and one individualised session. The primary outcome, rated blind, was psychiatrist effort in establishing shared understanding (self-repair). Secondary outcome was the therapeutic relationship. Results: Psychiatrists receiving the intervention used 44% more self-repair than the control group (adjusted difference in means 6.4, 95% CI 1.46–11.33, P<0.011, a large effect) adjusting for baseline self-repair. Psychiatrists rated the therapeutic relationship more positively (adjusted difference in means 0.20, 95% CI 0.03–0.37, P = 0.022, a medium effect), as did patients (adjusted difference in means 0.21, 95% CI 0.01–0.41, P = 0.043, a medium effect). Conclusions: Shared understanding can be successfully targeted in training and improves relationships in treating psychosis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjp.bp.115.179499

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Federico M, Priebe S, Fusco C, Strapelli N, Singh R, McCabe R. Communication about psychotic symptoms in long-term psychiatric care. Psychopathology 2012; 46: 233-40.
  2. Kingdon DJ, Turkington D. Cognitive Therapy of Schizophrenia. Guilford Press, 2008.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McCabe, R., John, P., Dooley, J., Healey, P., Cushing, A., Kingdon, D., Bremner, S., & Priebe, S.
Affiliations
University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
McCabe, Rose
Venue
British Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2016-12
Volume
209
Issue
6
Pages
517-524
ISSN
  • 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-1465
OpenAlex
W2356179094
Cited by
74
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 9
FWCI
11.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • City Research Online (City University London) (acceptedVersion)
  • Open Research Exeter (University of Exeter) (acceptedVersion)
  • Sussex Research Online (University of Sussex) (submittedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
  • Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Queen Mary University of London
  • Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (PB-PG-0408-16279)
  • University of Exeter
  • University of Southampton
  • School of Electronic Engineering and Computer Science, Queen Mary University of London
  • Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry
  • Research for Patient Benefit Programme
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
communication training, therapeutic relationship, psychosis, schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, mutual understanding, self-healing, outpatient psychiatry
MeSH terms
Adult, Communication, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Physician-Patient Relations, Psychiatry, Psychotic Disorders, Schizophrenia, Single-Blind Method

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review