Cited by 27Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesCriminal Justice and Corrections AnalysisPsychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending

Predicting self-harm in prisoners: risk factors and a prognostic model in a cohort of 542 prison entrants

Open access
Ryland, Howard, Gould, Charlotte, McGeorge, Tristan, Hawton, Keith, Fazel, Seena·2020·European Psychiatry

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Self-harm is common in prisoners. There is an association between self-harm in prisoners and subsequent suicide, both within prison and on release. The aim of this study is to develop and evaluate a prediction model to identify male prisoners at high risk of self-harm. METHODS: We developed an 11-item screening model, based on risk factors identified from the literature. This screen was administered to 542 prisoners within 7 days of arrival in two male prisons in England. Participants were followed up for 6 months to identify those who subsequently self-harmed in prison. Analysis was conducted using Cox proportional hazard regression. Discrimination and calibration were determined for the model. The model was subsequently optimized using multivariable analysis, weighting variables, and dropping poorly performing items. RESULTS: Seventeen (3.1%) of the participants self-harmed during follow up (median 53 days). The strongest risk factors were previous self-harm in prison (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 9.3 [95% CI: 3.3-16.6]) and current suicidal ideation (aHR = 7.6 [2.1-27.4]). As a continuous score, a one-point increase in the suicide screen was significantly associated with self-harm (HR = 1.4, 1.1-1.7). At the prespecified cut off score of 5, the screening model was associated with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.66 (0.53-0.79), with poor calibration. The optimized model saw two items dropped from the original screening tool, weighting of risk factors based on a multivariable model, and an AUC of 0.84 (0.76-0.92). CONCLUSIONS: Further work is necessary to clarify the association between risk factors and self-harm in prison. Despite good face validity, current screening tools for self-harm need validation in new prison samples.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2020.40

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Because prisoners are generally a population at high risk of self-harm, the identification of those at elevated risk of self-harm is a complex task and will probably require high-quality methods and external validation.

    “Because prisoners are generally a population at high risk of self-harm, the identification of those at elevated risk of self-harm is a complex task,16 and will probably require high-quality methods and external validation.82”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 32 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ryland, H., Gould, C., McGeorge, T., Hawton, K., & Fazel, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • North Middlesex University Hospital NHS Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
Fazel, Seena
Venue
European Psychiatry
Published
2020
Volume
63
Issue
1
Pages
e42-e42
ISSN
  • 0924-9338 (ISSN-L)
  • 1778-3585
OpenAlex
W3020662587
Cited by
27
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2
FWCI
1.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust (202836/Z/16/Z, 202836)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
Keywords
self-harm, prisoners, suicide risk, risk prediction model, screening tool, suicidal ideation, incarcerated men, discrimination and calibration
MeSH terms
Adult, England, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prisoners, Prisons, Prognosis, Risk Factors, Reproducibility of Results, Cohort Studies, Self-Injurious Behavior, Young Adult, Suicidal Ideation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review