The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Development process of artificial intelligence based chatbot to support and promote mental wellbeing in sparsely populated areas of five European countries
Open accessAbstract
Introduction: In many countries, people face problems regarding access to care, 24/7 support and evidence-based support. Digital interventions and services, such as chatbots, can be one option to tackle these challenges. There is a lack knowledge regarding how mental health chatbots are developed and how to ensure that there is collaboration between mental health and digital technology experts and users. Objectives: This presentation describes the phases of the development for the ChatPal mental health and wellbeing chatbot. Methods: Development process was conducted in five and with four different languages. First, using an electronic survey for mental health professionals (n =190) we screened how familiar they are with chatbots and how they evaluated their potential. Second, university students and staff, mental health professionals and service users (n=78) participated in workshops to design the chatbot content. Finally, the content and scripts of chatbot were written in multi-professional and multi-national collaboration. Results: ChatPal is based on the PERMAH model of positive psychology and on the idea that we all have mental health which needs boosting and support from time to time. ChatPal includes relevant mental health information, exercises, mood diaries and simple monitoring and self-care tools. Based on preliminary evaluations, the ChatPal chatbot offers an option to offer support in areas where other mental health services are lacking or are insufficient. Conclusions: ChatPal is already freely available in application stores and first scientific trials are have started. Preliminary results of 4-week and subsequent 12-week in-the-wild trials will be in place at the time of EPA 2022 conference. Disclosure: No significant relationships.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Nursing research has been predominantly focusing on the utilization of chatbots in areas such as mental health, weight management, antenatal education, and electronic fetal monitoring.
“Nursing research has been predominantly focusing on the utilization of chatbots in areas such as mental health [18, 19], weight management [20, 21], antenatal education [22], and electronic fetal monitoring [16].”
From Development and effects of a chatbot education program for self-directed learning in nursing students (2025) · cites this paper as [18]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Han, J.-W., Park, J., & Lee, H. (2025) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-025-07316-2 · Cited by 41
“Nursing research has been predominantly focusing on the utilization of chatbots in areas such as mental health [18, 19], weight management [20, 21], antenatal education [22], and electronic fetal monitoring [16].”
Rajput, N. K., Diviit, M. G., Singh, S., & Ojha, M. K. (2025) · Lecture notes in electrical engineering · doi:10.1007/978-981-96-9203-3_21
Metadata
- Authors
- Kuosmanen, L., Vartiainen, A.-K., Nieminen, H., Kostenius, C., Bond, R., Mulvenna, M., Potts, C., Ennis, E., Malcolm, M., Vakaloudis, A., Cahill, B., & Dhanapala, I.
- Affiliations
- University of Eastern Finland (FI)
- Luleå University of Technology (SE)
- University of Ulster (GB)
- Munster Technological University (IE)
- Corresponding author
- Kuosmanen, L.
- ORCID
- Venue
- European Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Royal College of Psychiatrists
- Published
- 2022-06
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- S1
- Pages
- S168-S168
- ISSN
- 0924-9338 (ISSN-L)
- 1778-3585
- PMC
- PMC9562391
- OpenAlex
- W4294202334
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2
- FWCI
- 0.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- European Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Epubl LTU (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
- Keywords
- mental health chatbots, psychological well-being, sparsely populated areas, access to mental health care, digital mental health interventions, positive psychology, interprofessional collaboration, chatbot development, mood diary, mental health professionals' perspectives
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review