The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Researching recovery from psychosis: a user-led project
Open accessAbstract
Aims and Method: Involvement of service users in the research process and examination of recovery from psychosis are two topics that have generated recent interest within the research community. This user-led study examines the subjective experience of recovery in people with experience of psychosis. Seven interviews were analysed using interpretative phenomenological analysis and several themes emerged from the data. Results: Recovery from psychosis was found to be a complex and idiosyncratic process, which often involved rebuilding life, rebuilding self and hope for a better future (each of these themes consisted of sub-themes). Clinical Implications: The importance of continuity of care, the need for greater choice in approaches aimed at alleviating distress, access to stories of recovery and encouragement, and the importance of more individualised recovery care plans are among factors highlighted.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Wood et al. ( 2019 ) highlight that experiences such as disempowerment, lack of choice and control, and uncollaborative care all conflict with recovery values (Pitt et al., 2007 ).”
From A qualitative synthesis of patients' experiences of re-traumatization in acute mental health inpatient settings (2023) · cites this paper as Pitt et al., 2007
In the citing paper
“Knowing more about mental health was approached both as part of embracing a given diagnosis [e.g., the goal “coming to know your illness” (69)] and discarding it [e.g., “developing a critique of mental health services” (55)].”
From Recovery from Severe Mental Health Problems: A Systematic Review of Service User and Informal Caregiver Perspectives (2021) · cites this paper as [55]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Qualitative Psychology: A Practical Guide to Research Methods
Brooks, S. (2008) · QMiP Bulletin · doi:10.53841/bpsqmip.2008.1.6.47 · Cited by 4,361
Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis
Spiers, J., & A.Smith, J. (2020) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781526421036813346 · Cited by 4,048
Recovery from mental illness: the guiding vision of the mental health service system in the 1990s
Anthony, W. A. (1993) · Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal · doi:10.1037/h0095655 · Cited by 3,700
Recovery: the lived experience of rehabilitation
Deegan, P. E. (1988) · Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal · doi:10.1037/h0099565 · Cited by 1,541 · cited 3×
“The findings of this study are consistent with other research that highlights recovery as a process (Deegan, 1988; Leete, 1989; Unzicker, 1989) and further validates the key themes identified here (Smith, 2000; Ridgeway, 2001; Andresen et al, 2003; Tandy, 2003; Warren 2003).”
BackgroundResultInterpretative phenomenological analysis
Smith, J. A., & Osborn, M. (2004) · Doing Social Psychology Research · doi:10.1002/9780470776278.ch10 · Cited by 1,204
What Is Recovery? A Conceptual Model and Explication
Jacobson, N., & Greenley, D. (2001) · Psychiatric Services · doi:10.1176/appi.ps.52.4.482 · Cited by 888
The experience of recovery from schizophrenia: Towards an empirically validated stage model
Andresen, R., Oades, L., & Caputi, P. (2003) · Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1046/j.1440-1614.2003.01234.x · Cited by 871
ReStorying psychiatric disability: Learning from first person recovery narratives.
Ridgway, P. (2001) · Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal · doi:10.1037/h0095071 · Cited by 426
Social Inclusion and Recovery: A Model For Mental Health Practice
Repper, J., & Perkins, R. E. (2003) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 353
How I Perceive and Manage My Illness
Leete, E. (1989) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/15.2.197 · Cited by 240
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Tandy, 2003, How do service users account for their recovery from serious mental illness?
- 2001, The Journey to Recovery – The Government's Vision for Mental Healthcare
- Warren, 2003, Exploring the Concept of Recovery from the Perspective of People with Mental Health Problems
- Baker, 2001, Roads to Recovery: How People with Mental Health Problems Recover and Find Ways of Coping
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis
Spiers, J., & A.Smith, J. (2020) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781526421036813346 · Cited by 4,048
Gilburt, H., Rose, D., & Slade, M. (2008) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/1472-6963-8-92 · Cited by 396
“The benefits of userled research are that the work done is relevant to the concerns of service users [12], the reciprocal relationship between interviewer and interviewee puts both on a more equal footing [13], aids the ability to achieve real empathy [14] and can elicit the collection of data not otherwise accessible…”
BackgroundNeil, S. T., Kilbride, M., Pitt, L., Nothard, S., Welford, M., Sellwood, W., & Morrison, A. P. (2009) · Psychosis · doi:10.1080/17522430902913450 · Cited by 362
Self-citationReseArch with Patient and Public invOlvement: a RealisT evaluation – the RAPPORT study
Wilson, P., Mathie, E., Keenan, J., McNeilly, E., Goodman, C., Howe, A., Poland, F., Staniszewska, S., Kendall, S., Munday, D., et al. (2015) · Health Services and Delivery Research · doi:10.3310/hsdr03380 · Cited by 297
“The RAPPORT study sample was limited to six topic areas; while these were purposively selected to provide a broad range in terms of designs, settings and target participant populations, we acknowledge that this does not include areas where, for example, there is a growing body of user-led research, such as in mental h…”
Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis in Mental Health and Psychotherapy Research
Larkin, M., & Thompson, A. R. (2011) · doi:10.1002/9781119973249.ch8 · Cited by 269
Metadata
- Authors
- Pitt, L., Kilbride, M., Nothard, S., Welford, M., & Morrison, A. P.
- Affiliations
- Manchester Mental Health and Social Care Trust (GB)
- University of Manchester (GB)
- ORCID
- Morrison, Anthony P.
- Venue
- Psychiatric Bulletin
- Publisher
- Royal College of Psychiatrists
- Published
- 2007-02
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 55-60
- ISSN
- 0955-6036 (ISSN-L)
- 1472-1473
- OpenAlex
- W2109490393
- Cited by
- 228
- References
- 19
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 15
- FWCI
- 11.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Psychiatric Bulletin (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
- Keywords
- recovery from psychosis, service user involvement, lived experience of psychosis, hope, continuity of care, individualized care
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
