Cited by 115Primate Behavior and EcologyLanguage and cultural evolutionAnimal Vocal Communication and Behavior

Darwin's Legacy and the Study of Primate Visual Communication

De WAAL, FRANS B.M.·2003·Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Abstract

After Charles Darwin's The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals, published in 1872, we had to wait 60 years before the theme of animal expressions was picked up by another astute observer. In 1935, Nadezhda Ladygina-Kohts published a detailed comparison of the expressive behavior of a juvenile chimpanzee and of her own child. After Kohts, we had to wait until the 1960s for modern ethological analyses of primate facial and gestural communication. Again, the focus was on the chimpanzee, but ethograms on other primates appeared as well. Our understanding of the range of expressions in other primates is at present far more advanced than that in Darwin's time. A strong social component has been added: instead of focusing on the expressions per se, they are now often classified according to the social situations in which they typically occur. Initially, quantitative analyses were sequential (i.e., concerned with temporal associations between behavior patterns), and they avoided the language of emotions. I will discuss some of this early work, including my own on the communicative repertoire of the bonobo, a close relative of the chimpanzee (and ourselves). I will provide concrete examples to make the point that there is a much richer matrix of contexts possible than the common behavioral categories of aggression, sex, fear, play, and so on. Primate signaling is a form of negotiation, and previous classifications have ignored the specifics of what animals try to achieve wit…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1196/annals.1280.003

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This may expose primates to increased signals of aggression, particularly if visual gestures are perceived as threatening, such as direct eye contact.

    “This may expose primates to increased signals of aggression, particularly if visual gestures are perceived as threatening [122], such as direct eye contact [123].”
  • Close relatedness to humans may play a role in primate response to visitors as some facial expressions and visual gestures are homologous with human gestures.

    “The close relatedness to humans may also play a role in primate response to visitors as some facial expressions and visual gestures are homologous with human gestures [121,122].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
De WAAL, F. B. M.
Venue
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-12
Volume
1000
Issue
1
Pages
7-31
ISSN
  • 0077-8923 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-6632
OpenAlex
W2123471046
Cited by
115
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Language and cultural evolution
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology › Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
Keywords
bonobos, ethology, social context of behavior, primate culture
MeSH terms
Affect, Aggression, Animals, Culture, Biological Evolution, Facial Expression, Gestures, Grooming, Humans, Laughter, Nonverbal Communication, Primates, Smiling, Visual Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review