Cited by 253Animal Behavior and Welfare StudiesAnimal Behavior and ReproductionAvian ecology and behavior

Noninvasive monitoring of hormones in bird droppings: physiological validation, sampling, extraction, sex differences, and the influence of diet on hormone metabolite levels

GOYMANN, WOLFGANG·2005·Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Abstract

During the past several years, the noninvasive measurement of steroid metabolites from mammalian feces and bird droppings has become more and more popular. With an increasing acceptance of the method, investigators may become less aware of the need to validate their assays. It is shown why such validations are essential for each new species investigated and various ways to physiologically validate such noninvasive methods are described. Using the European stonechat (Saxicola torquata rubicola) as a model, it is explained why a validated method to measure androgen metabolites in males does not necessarily work in females. In addition the difficulties that may be neglected owing to the superficial ease of sampling and processing of excreta are investigated. Various issues that may arise during sampling, storage, and extraction of excreta are addressed. Finally, results suggesting that experimental manipulations of the diet may affect hormone metabolite levels in European stonechats are presented. So far, only a few studies have investigated the impact of diet on hormone metabolite levels, and these are the first data to report such an impact in birds. More studies are urgently needed to learn more about differences between the sexes, individuals, and populations and the impact of diet and energy metabolism on hormone metabolites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1196/annals.1343.005

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A sex-dependent excretion of FGMs exists in certain bird species, such as the European stonechat, Peregrine falcon, and Adelie penguins.

    “Conversely, a sex-dependent excretion of FGMs does exist in certain bird species, such as the European stonechat (Saxicola torquata rubicola) (Goymann, 2005), the Peregrine falcon (Falco peregrinus) (Staley et al., 2007), and the Adelie penguins (Pygoscelis adeliae) (Ninnes et al., 2010).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
GOYMANN, W.
Affiliations
Max Planck Society (DE)
Corresponding author
GOYMANN, WOLFGANG
Venue
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-06
Volume
1046
Issue
1
Pages
35-53
ISSN
  • 0077-8923 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-6632
OpenAlex
W2034312165
Cited by
253
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 9
FWCI
2.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Funders
European Science Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
Keywords
bird droppings, fecal steroid metabolites, assay validation, androgen metabolites, sex differences, energy metabolism
MeSH terms
Animals, Birds, Diet, Feces, Female, Hormones, Male, Mammals, Seasons, Sex Factors, Specimen Handling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review