Cited by 89Psychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsPosttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

Alexithymia in PTSD: Psychometric and FMRI Studies

FREWEN, PAUL A., PAIN, CLAIRE, DOZOIS, DAVID J. A., LANIUS, RUTH A.·2006·Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Two studies examined correlates of alexithymia in posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). In study 1 (n = 77 individuals with PTSD and 45 controls) Toronto alexithymia scale (TAS-20) scores were positively correlated with PTSD symptoms, dissociation, and childhood abuse and neglect. In study 2, TAS-20 scores were examined as correlates of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) response to trauma script imagery. In 16 controls, TAS-20 scores correlated positively with response in medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), and negatively with response in anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and thalamus. In 26 individuals with PTSD, TAS-20 scores correlated positively with response in insula, posterior cingulate cortex (PCC), and thalamus, and negatively with response in ACC.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1196/annals.1364.029

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Atypicalities in the structure and function of interoceptive cortex (AI and ACC) in alexithymia seem relatively specific to these regions, rather than diffuse across the brain.

    “atypicalities in the structure and function of interoceptive cortex (AI and ACC) in alexithymia, which seem relatively specific to these regions, rather than diffuse across the brain (e.g. Borsci et al., 2009; Deng et al., 2013; Frewen et al., 2006; Goerlich-Dobre et al., 2014; Grabe et al., 2014; Heinzel et al., 2010; Ihme et al., 2013; Jongen et al., 2014; Kano and Fukudo, 2013; Kano et al., 200”

    From Atypical interoception as a common risk factor for psychopathology: A review (2021) · cites this paper as Frewen et al., 2006

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
FREWEN, P. A., PAIN, C., DOZOIS, D. J. A., & LANIUS, R. A.
Affiliations
Western University (CA)
Corresponding author
LANIUS, RUTH A.
Venue
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-07
Volume
1071
Issue
1
Pages
397-400
ISSN
  • 0077-8923 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-6632
OpenAlex
W1999989599
Cited by
89
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 7
FWCI
2.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
alexithymia, post-traumatic stress disorder, Toronto Alexithymia Scale, dissociation, childhood abuse and neglect, BOLD signal, medial prefrontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, thalamus, insula, posterior cingulate cortex, brain activation
MeSH terms
Adult, Affective Symptoms, Cerebral Cortex, Child, Child Abuse, Dissociative Disorders, Emotions, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Oxygen, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychometrics, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Thalamus, Prefrontal Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review