Cited by 69Child Abuse and TraumaPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsChild Welfare and Adoption

Alexithymia in individuals maltreated as children and adolescents: a meta‐analysis

Khan, Anika N., Jaffee, Sara R.·2022·Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: Children who are maltreated show deficits in emotion recognition, expression, and understanding. The goal of the current meta‐analysis was to determine the degree to which maltreatment is associated with deficits in the ability to recognize one’s own emotions – a phenomenon known as alexithymia. Alexithymia may be a mechanism explaining the association between childhood maltreatment and various psychological disorders. Methods: This meta‐analytic review (88 studies, n = 43,076) examined the association between the experience of childhood maltreatment and alexithymia, mainly in adulthood. Additional meta‐analyses were run to examine if the strength of the association between maltreatment as a child and alexithymia varied as a function of the type of maltreatment individuals reported and other moderators. Results: We found significant small effect sizes for all models, indicating higher levels of maltreatment in childhood or adolescence were associated with higher levels of alexithymia. Alexithymia was more strongly associated with forms of neglect than with physical or sexual abuse. The effect sizes also increased as the percentages of females in the sample increased. Conclusions: Results suggest that researchers should examine whether alexithymia is a transdiagnostic mechanism in the association between childhood maltreatment and psychopathology and whether targeting alexithymia in treatment could reduce a wide range of symptoms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jcpp.13616

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 65 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Khan, A. N., & Jaffee, S. R.
Affiliations
University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Jaffee, Sara R.
Venue
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-04-19
Volume
63
Issue
9
Pages
963-972
ISSN
  • 0021-9630 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7610
OpenAlex
W4224225231
Cited by
69
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 3
FWCI
2.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation (DGE‐1321851)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Child Welfare and Adoption
Keywords
alexithymia, child abuse, adolescent maltreatment, emotional awareness, neglect, physical abuse, sexual abuse, transdiagnostic mechanisms, psychopathology, sex differences
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Affective Symptoms, Mental Disorders, Child, Child Abuse, Emotions, Female, Humans, Psychopathology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review