The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Understanding the Normalization of Telemedicine Services through Qualitative Evaluation: Table 1
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: Qualitative studies can help us understand the "successes" and "failures" of telemedicine to normalize within clinical service provision. This report presents the development of a robust conceptual model of normalization processes in the implementation and development of telemedicine services. DESIGN: Retrospective and cumulative analysis of longitudinal qualitative data from three studies was undertaken between 1997 and 2002. Observation and semistructured interviews produced a substantial body of data relating to approximately 582 discrete data collection episodes. Data were analyzed separately in each of three studies. Cumulative analysis was conducted by constant comparison. RESULTS: (1) Implementation of telemedicine services depends on a positive link with a (local or national) policy level sponsor. (2) Adoption of telemedicine systems in service depends on successful structural integration so that development of organizational structures takes place. (3) Translation of telemedicine technologies into clinical practice depends on the enrollment of cohesive, cooperative groups. (4) Stabilization of telemedicine systems in practice depends on integration at the level of professional knowledge and practice, where clinicians are able to accommodate telemedicine through the development of new procedures and protocols. CONCLUSION: A rationalized linear diffusion model of "telehealthcare" is inadequate in assessing the potential for normalization, and the political, organizational, and "ownership" problems that govern the process of development, implementation, and normalization need to be accounted for. This report presents a model for assessing the potential for successful implementation of telehealthcare services. This model defines the requirements for the successful normalization of telemedicine systems in clinical practice.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“two other reports [11, 12] conclude that complex relationships between the technical, social and organisational dimensions need to be negotiated to achieve implementation”
From Transitioning a home telehealth project into a sustainable, large-scale service: a qualitative study (2016) · cites this paper as [12]
In the citing paper
“P3 Translation of telemedicine technologies into clinical practice depends on the enrolment of heterogeneous actors into relatively cohesive, co-operative groups, in which functional identities are negotiated and established a priori and powers relatively well defined.”
From Development of a theory of implementation and integration: Normalization Process Theory (2009) · cites this paper as [17]
In the citing paper
“P1 Implementation of telemedicine services depends on a positive link with a (local or national) policy level sponsor, so that telemedicine is defined as an appropriate means of delivering care, and appropriate infrastructures are developed.”
From Development of a theory of implementation and integration: Normalization Process Theory (2009) · cites this paper as [17]
In the citing paper
“P5 The normalisation of telemedicine as a means of health care delivery (in whatever setting, and at whatever level of healthcare provision) is conditional on P1 + P2 + P3 + P4.”
From Development of a theory of implementation and integration: Normalization Process Theory (2009) · cites this paper as [17]
In the citing paper
“P2 Adoption of telemedicine systems in service depends on successful integration at the level of structural legitimation so that it is supported as, and thus practically incorporated into, health care delivery through the development of organizational structures.”
From Development of a theory of implementation and integration: Normalization Process Theory (2009) · cites this paper as [17]
In the citing paper
“The development of a set of explanatory ideas around normalization has shifted from an initial set of empirical generalizations presented as synthetic propositions or assertions [17], to a robust conceptual model that presented generalizable propositions [7], and finally to a middle-range theory that offers a set of mechanism-based explanations for processes of implementation, embedding, and integ”
From Development of a theory of implementation and integration: Normalization Process Theory (2009) · cites this paper as [17]
In the citing paper
“P4 Stabilization of telemedicine systems in practice depends on integration at the level of professional knowledge and practice, where clinicians are able to accommodate telemedicine in their clinical activities through the development of new procedures and protocols.”
From Development of a theory of implementation and integration: Normalization Process Theory (2009) · cites this paper as [17]
Citations
Cites
The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2017) · Aldine (Routledge reprint) · doi:10.4324/9780203793206 · Cited by 25,789
Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists
Strauss, A. L. (1987) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511557842 · Cited by 12,277
Pinch, T. J., & Bijker, W. E. (1984) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/030631284014003004 · Cited by 3,890
The Social Construction of Technological Systems
Westrum, R. (1989) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/030631289019001010 · Cited by 3,367
Qualitative research methods in health technology assessment: a review of the literature.
Murphy, Dingwall, Greatbatch, Parker, & Watson (1998) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta2160 · Cited by 1,107
Social Organization of Medical Work
Strauss, A. L., FAGERHAUGH, S. Y., Suczek, B., & Wiener, C. L. (2017) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315129679 · Cited by 808
Systematic review of studies of patient satisfaction with telemedicine
Mair, F. (2000) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.320.7248.1517 · Cited by 734
Self-citationSystematic review of cost effectiveness studies of telemedicine interventions
Whitten, P. S., Mair, F. S., Haycox, A., May, C. R., Williams, T. L., & Hellmich, S. (2002) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.324.7351.1434 · Cited by 526
Self-citationExperiments in Knowing: Gender and Method in the Social Sciences
Sprague, J., & Oakley, A. (2001) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/3089296 · Cited by 501
Kaplan, B. (2001) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/s1386-5056(01)00184-8 · Cited by 380
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Pinch T . The social construction of technology: a review. In: Fox R (ed). Technological Change. Amsterdam: Harwood, 1996, pp 17–26.
- McFarlane A Harrison R Wallace P . Joint medical teleconsultations: qualitative evaluation. Paper presented at European General Practitioners Research Workshop, Gdansk, Poland, October 2001.
- 10.1258/1357633021937370 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–155 of 155
Palliative home-based technology from a practitioner's perspective: benefits and disadvantages
Johnston, B. M. (2014) · Smart Homecare Technology and TeleHealth · doi:10.2147/shtt.s42687 · Cited by 6
Role flexibility among telemedicine service providers in the north-west and west of Ireland
MacFarlane, A. E., Clerkin, P., & Murphy, A. W. (2005) · Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare · doi:10.1258/1357633054461813 · Cited by 6
Self-citationPope, C. J., Turnbull, J. C., Halford, S., Pritchard, J., Calestani, M., Salisbury, C., May, C. R., Barrett, C., & Lattimer, V. (2011) · Research Repository (Kingston University London) · Cited by 6
Self-citationIrrcher, I., & ten Hove, M. (2019) · Advances in Ophthalmology and Optometry · doi:10.1016/j.yaoo.2019.04.019 · Cited by 5
Telemedicine as a tool for continuing medical education
Maria, A. R. J., Serra, H., Castro, M. G., & Heleno, B. (2023) · Family Practice · doi:10.1093/fampra/cmad085 · Cited by 5
La recomposition des patients et des pratiques médicales en télénéphrologie. Les présences décalées
Daudelin, G., Lehoux, P., & Sicotte, C. (2008) · Sciences sociales et santé · doi:10.3917/sss.263.0081 · Cited by 5
Woon, L. S., Maguire, P. A., Reay, R. E., Smith, D., Bastiampillai, T. J., & Looi, J. C. (2025) · Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare · doi:10.1177/1357633x241311623 · Cited by 4
Thesenvitz, J., Corley, S. M., Solberg, L., & Carvalho, C. (2021) · Healthcare Management Forum · doi:10.1177/08404704211041969 · Cited by 4
Tintorer, D. L., Manresa‐Domínguez, J. M., Jiménez‐Zarco, A. I., Rodríguez-Blanco, T., Beneyto, S. F., Torán‐Monserrat, P., Mundet, X., & Saigí-Rubió, F. (2020) · BMC Family Practice · doi:10.1186/s12875-020-1081-x · Cited by 4
Understanding Innovation Deployment and Evaluation in Healthcare: The Triality Framework
Sharma, U., Barnett, J. C., & Clarke, M. (2012) · InTech eBooks · doi:10.5772/35671 · Cited by 4
RFID and Assisted Living for the Elderly
Parry, D., & Symonds, J. (2009) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-60566-298-5.ch007 · Cited by 4
Emerging Technologies for Health Communication
Pappas, Y., & Car, J. (2011) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781444346855.ch18 · Cited by 4
Telemedicine for Pregnant Women on a Japanese Remote Island: A Two-year Report
Ishikawa, Y., Nakanishi, K., Masuda, A., Hayasaka, M., Tsumura, A., Murakami, K., Umazume, T., Masuda, T., 西脇, 邦., & Kato, Y. (2023) · JMA Journal · doi:10.31662/jmaj.2022-0195 · Cited by 3
Bharath, K. N., Babu, K. S., & Ravi, V. (2024) · The Open Public Health Journal · doi:10.2174/0118749445326668240801105910 · Cited by 3
Dinesen, B., Hejlesen, O. K., Andersen, S. K., & Toft, E. S. (2011) · World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, September 7 - 12, 2009, Munich, Germany · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-21683-1_16 · Cited by 3
Aas, I. H. M. (2010) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-61692-010-4.ch002 · Cited by 3
Rowther, A. A., Mehmood, A., Razzak, J., Atiq, H., Castillo‐Salgado, C., & Saleem, H. T. (2022) · SSM - Qualitative Research in Health · doi:10.1016/j.ssmqr.2022.100150 · Cited by 3
Harniess, P., Basu, A. P., Gibbs, D., & Bezemer, J. (2025) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.70215 · Cited by 2
Woon, L. S., Maguire, P. A., Looi, J. C., & Reay, R. E. (2025) · International Journal of Telemedicine and Applications · doi:10.1155/ijta/4100418 · Cited by 2
A scoping review on remote patient monitoring technologies
Venkatesan, V., Osoro, I., & Rajanandh, M. G. (2026) · Discover Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s44163-026-01177-4 · Cited by 2
Improving Patient Safety with Telemedicine
Aas, I. H. M. (2012) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-2657-7.ch004 · Cited by 2
Home Medication Management by Videophone: Translation from Pilot Project to Integrated Service
Wade, V., Littleford, A., & Kralik, D. (2011) · Communications in medical and care compunetics · doi:10.1007/8754_2011_26 · Cited by 2
Olve, N.-G., & Vimarlund, V. (2005) · Cited by 2
Joseph, V. V. (2013) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-2979-0.ch007 · Cited by 2
Policy aspirations and practice in english telecare: a case study of story-lines and invisible work
Lynch, J. (2015) · University of Birmingham Institutional Research Archive (University of Birmingham) · Cited by 2
Granja, C., Janssen, W., & Johansen, M. A. (2018) · doi:10.2196/preprints.10235 · Cited by 2
Balayah, Z., Stavropoulou, C., Scarbrough, H., Nigam, A., & Ziemann, A. (2025) · Frontiers in Health Services · doi:10.3389/frhs.2025.1373429 · Cited by 2
May, C. R., Finch, T. L., & Rapley, T. (2026) · NIHR Open Research · doi:10.3310/nihropenres.14315.1 · Cited by 1
Self-citationTechnology, Geriatric Practice, and the Future of Psychiatry
Pulier, M. L. (2007) · Journal of Psychiatric Practice · doi:10.1097/01.pra.0000281489.19570.b1 · Cited by 1
Joseph, V. V. (2014) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-6339-8.ch065 · Cited by 1
Evaluation Considerations for E-Health Systems
Kastania, A. (2010) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-61692-843-8.ch020 · Cited by 1
Sociotechnical influences on outcomes in telehomecare
Shea, K. (2007) · UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona) · Cited by 1
Ross, J. (2016) · UCL Discovery (University College London) · Cited by 1
Mental Health Care in Primary Care Settings
Carney, C. P., Felker, B. L., & O’Connor, M. K. (2004) · Psychosomatics · doi:10.1176/appi.psy.45.3.272
Sharma, U. (2011) · Brunel University Research Archive (BURA) (Brunel University London)
Evaluation Considerations for E-Health Systems
Kastania, A. (2012) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-2770-3.ch057
Architecting for Connected Healthcare
Tambo, T., Hoffmann-Petersen, N., & Bejder, K. (2012) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-1824-4.ch013
Timmer, S., & Gils, J. V. (2017) · Geron · doi:10.1007/s40718-017-0024-7
Spithoff, S. M. (2019) · TSpace (University of Toronto)
Success and failure of e-health interventions: A systematic review of the literaturePreprint
Granja, C., Janssen, W., & Johansen, M. A. (2018) · doi:10.2196/preprints.10235.a
Alyamani, A. M. A., Alsulami, A. N. M., Raea, S. M., Alruqaie, R. I. M., Albather, M. H., Alamri, B. J., Alharb, M. A., Alshareef, . A., Binselm, K. R. A., Alshaghroud, . M., et al. (2018) · International Journal of Health Sciences · doi:10.53730/ijhs.v2ns1.15414
Smith, V., Marshall, A., Lie, M. L. S., Bidmead, E., Beckwith, B., van Oudgaarden, E. D., & Robson, S. C. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13549836
Lennox, L., Linwood-Amor, A., Maher, L., & Reed, J. (2020) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13088038
Lennox, L., Linwood-Amor, A., Maher, L., & Reed, J. (2020) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13088032
Lennox, L., Linwood-Amor, A., Maher, L., & Reed, J. (2020) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13088035
Harris, M., Taylor, G., Pikkemaat, M., Thulesius, H. O., & Nymberg, V. M. (2026) · JMIR Human Factors · doi:10.2196/73609
Fletcher, A., Poon, K., Pink, J., Macolino, K., & Marotti, S. B. (2026) · Australian Journal of Rural Health · doi:10.1111/ajr.70222
Saifan, A. R., Ayoub, A. Y., Alarabyat, I. A., Saleh, Z. T., Abujaber, D. A., Al‐Yateem, N., Rezq, K. A., Saleem, N. H., Amin, E. M., Alkouri, O. A., et al. (2026) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph23101243
Metadata
- Authors
- May, C., Harrison, R., Finch, T., MacFarlane, A., Mair, F., & Wallace, P.
- Affiliations
- University of Liverpool (GB)
- Corresponding author
- May, Carl
- Venue
- Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2003-11
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 596-604
- ISSN
- 1067-5027 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-974X
- PMC
- PMC264438
- OpenAlex
- W2113222987
- Cited by
- 155
- References
- 56
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 4.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- ARAN (University of Galway Research Repository) (Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (submittedVersion)
- ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
- Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University) (submittedVersion)
- University of Galway Research Repository (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Research Repository UCD (University College Dublin) (cc-by-nc)
- Funders
- Health Service Executive
- Economic and Social Research Council
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
- Keywords
- telemedicine, normalization process, conceptual model, organizational integration, clinician adoption, professional knowledge and practice, diffusion of innovations, clinical practice change
- MeSH terms
- Diffusion of Innovation, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Health Services Administration, Health Services Research, Longitudinal Studies, Organizational Innovation, Retrospective Studies, Telemedicine
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review