The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Research Agenda for Personal Health Records (PHRs)
Open accessAbstract
Patients, policymakers, providers, payers, employers, and others have increasing interest in using personal health records (PHRs) to improve healthcare costs, quality, and efficiency. While organizations now invest millions of dollars in PHRs, the best PHR architectures, value propositions, and descriptions are not universally agreed upon. Despite widespread interest and activity, little PHR research has been done to date, and targeted research investment in PHRs appears inadequate. The authors reviewed the existing PHR specific literature (100 articles) and divided the articles into seven categories, of which four in particular--evaluation of PHR functions, adoption and attitudes of healthcare providers and patients towards PHRs, PHR related privacy and security, and PHR architecture--present important research opportunities. We also briefly discuss other research related to PHRs, PHR research funding sources, and PHR business models. We believe that additional PHR research can increase the likelihood that future PHR system deployments will beneficially impact healthcare costs, quality, and efficiency.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Informatics systems to promote improved care for chronic illness: a literature review
Dorr, D., Bonner, L. M., Cohen, A. N., Shoai, R. S., Perrin, R., Chaney, E., & Young, A. S. (2007) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1197/jamia.m2255 · Cited by 257
Hess, R., Bryce, C. L., Paone, S., Fischer, G., McTigue, K. M., Olshansky, E., Zickmund, S., Fitzgerald, K., & Siminerio, L. (2007) · Telemedicine and e-Health · doi:10.1089/tmj.2006.0089 · Cited by 144
Cited by
Personal health records: a scoping review
Archer, N., Fevrier-Thomas, U., Lokker, C., McKibbon, K. A., & Straus, S. E. (2011) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000105 · Cited by 573
The digital divide in adoption and use of a personal health record
Yamin, C. K., Emani, S., Williams, D. H., Lipsitz, S. R., Karson, A. S., Wald, J. S., & Bates, D. W. (2011) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2011.34 · Cited by 353
Self-citationReport of the AMIA EHR-2020 Task Force on the status and future direction of EHRs
Payne, T. H., Corley, S., Cullen, T. A., Gandhi, T. K., Harrington, L., Kuperman, G. J., Mattison, J. E., McCallie, D. P., McDonald, C. J., Tang, P. C., et al. (2015) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1093/jamia/ocv066 · Cited by 220
Challenges to Using an Electronic Personal Health Record by a Low-Income Elderly Population
Kim, E.-H., Stolyar, A., Lober, W. B., Herbaugh, A. L., Shinstrom, S. E., Zierler, B. K., Soh, C. B., & Kim, Y. (2009) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.1256 · Cited by 176
Nijland, N., van Gemert-Pijnen, J. E., Kelders, S. M., Brandenburg, B. J., & Seydel, E. R. (2011) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.1603 · Cited by 175
Metadata
- Authors
- Kaelber, D. C., Jha, A. K., Johnston, D., Middleton, B., & Bates, D. W.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2008-11-01
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 729-736
- ISSN
- 1067-5027 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-974X
- OpenAlex
- W2158701325
- Cited by
- 410
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 67.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Research Agenda for Personal Health Records (PHRs). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1197/jamia.m2547
- The paper
- Kaelber, D. C., Jha, A. K., Johnston, D., Middleton, B., & Bates, D. W. (2008). A Research Agenda for Personal Health Records (PHRs). Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. https://doi.org/10.1197/jamia.m2547
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
