Cited by 257Electronic Health Records SystemsChronic Disease Management StrategiesTechnology and Human Factors in Education and Health

Informatics systems to promote improved care for chronic illness: a literature review

Open access
Dorr, D., Bonner, L. M., Cohen, A. N., Shoai, R. S., Perrin, R., Chaney, E., Young, A. S.·2007·Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To understand information systems components important in supporting team-based care of chronic illness through a literature search. DESIGN: Systematic search of literature from 1996-2005 for evaluations of information systems used in the care of chronic illness. MEASUREMENTS: The relationship of design, quality, information systems components, setting, and other factors with process, quality outcomes, and health care costs was evaluated. RESULTS: In all, 109 articles were reviewed involving 112 information system descriptions. Chronic diseases targeted included diabetes (42.9% of reviewed articles), heart disease (36.6%), and mental illness (23.2%), among others. System users were primarily physicians, nurses, and patients. Sixty-seven percent of reviewed experiments had positive outcomes; 94% of uncontrolled, observational studies claimed positive results. Components closely correlated with positive experimental results were connection to an electronic medical record, computerized prompts, population management (including reports and feedback), specialized decision support, electronic scheduling, and personal health records. Barriers identified included costs, data privacy and security concerns, and failure to consider workflow. CONCLUSION The majority of published studies revealed a positive impact of specific health information technology components on chronic illness care. Implications for future research and system designs are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1197/jamia.m2255

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A meta-analysis would have been inappropriate because of significant heterogeneity among studies in sample characteristics, specific technologies studied, and functions of those technologies.

    “As others who have reviewed health IT research have pointed out, a meta-analysis would have been inappropriate because of the significant heterogeneity among studies in terms of sample characteristics, specific technologies studied, and functions of those technologies [93, 94].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dorr, D., Bonner, L. M., Cohen, A. N., Shoai, R. S., Perrin, R., Chaney, E., & Young, A. S.
Affiliations
  • Oregon Health & Science University (US)
  • Health Services Research & Development (US)
  • Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Centers (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Dorr, D.
Venue
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Published
2007-03-01
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
156-163
ISSN
  • 1067-5027 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-974X
OpenAlex
W2151576062
Cited by
257
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 25
FWCI
4.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. National Library of Medicine (K22 LM 8427-01, K22LM008427)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Technology and Human Factors in Education and Health
Keywords
health information systems, chronic care, team-based care, diabetes mellitus, heart disease, mental illness, electronic health records, clinical decision support, population management, personal health records, health care costs, data privacy and security, workflow integration
MeSH terms
Chronic Disease, Humans, Information Systems, Patient Care Team, Quality of Health Care, Multivariate Analysis, Medical Records Systems, Computerized, Health Care Costs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review