Cited by 63Trauma and Emergency Care StudiesEmergency and Acute Care StudiesHealthcare Policy and Management

The Influence of Insurance, Race, and Gender on Emergency Department Disposition

Selassie, Anbesaw Wolde, McCarthy, Melissa Lee, Pickelsimer, Emily Elisabeth·2003·Academic Emergency Medicine

Abstract

Abstract Objectives: To examine the influence of insurance, race, and gender on the likelihood of hospitalization among trauma patients. Methods: Statewide hospital discharge and emergency department (ED) visit data collected between 1996 and 2000 were merged to examine factors that influence hospitalization among patients who sustained an injury. Multivariate logistic regression was used to model the likelihood of hospitalization as a function of patient, injury, and hospital characteristics. Results: Of 1,512,611 patients who presented to an ED in South Carolina for treatment of a traumatic injury during the five‐year study period, 8% were hospitalized and 92% were treated and released. One fourth (26%) of the study population was uninsured. Insurance, race, and gender were significant predictors of hospitalization despite controlling for injury severity, comorbidities, age, trauma center level, place of residence, and year of injury. Regardless of injury severity, uninsured patients were significantly less likely to be hospitalized compared with privately insured patients (odds ratio [OR] 0.63, 99% CI = 0.62 to 0.65). Among those mildly to moderately injured, patients covered by Medicare or other government insurance policies were significantly more likely to be admitted compared with those with private coverage (OR 1.46, 99% CI = 1.41 to 1.52; OR 1.56, 99% CI = 1.36 to 1.78). Finally, among those mildly injured, African American females were significantly less likely to be admitted compared with white females (OR 0.63, 99% CI = 0.61 to 0.65). Conclusions: These results suggest that the disposition of trauma patients from the ED may be influenced by insurance and demographic characteristics in addition to the patient's clinical condition.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1197/s1069-6563(03)00497-4

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Selassie, A. W., McCarthy, M. L., & Pickelsimer, E. E.
Affiliations
  • Medical University of South Carolina (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
Venue
Academic Emergency Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-11
Volume
10
Issue
11
Pages
1260-1270
ISSN
  • 1069-6563 (ISSN-L)
  • 1553-2712
OpenAlex
W2139580402
Cited by
63
References
60
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
4.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Academic Emergency Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Emergency and Acute Care Studies
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
Keywords
emergency department disposition, hospitalization, trauma patients, uninsured patients, health insurance, racial disparities, gender disparities, African American women, Medicare, private insurance, injury severity, health care access
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Black or African American, Child, Child, Preschool, Emergency Service, Hospital, Female, Hospitalization, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Insurance, Health, Male, Middle Aged, Sex Factors, South Carolina, Wounds and Injuries, Injury Severity Score

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review