The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Gibbs Sampling Methods for Stick-Breaking Priors
Abstract
A rich and flexible class of random probability measures, which we call stick-breaking priors, can be constructed using a sequence of independent beta random variables. Examples of random measures that have this characterization include the Dirichlet process, its two-parameter extension, the two-parameter Poisson–Dirichlet process, finite dimensional Dirichlet priors, and beta two-parameter processes. The rich nature of stick-breaking priors offers Bayesians a useful class of priors for nonparametric problems, while the similar construction used in each prior can be exploited to develop a general computational procedure for fitting them. In this article we present two general types of Gibbs samplers that can be used to fit posteriors of Bayesian hierarchical models based on stick-breaking priors. The first type of Gibbs sampler, referred to as a Pólya urn Gibbs sampler, is a generalized version of a widely used Gibbs sampling method currently employed for Dirichlet process computing. This method applies to stick-breaking priors with a known Pólya urn characterization, that is, priors with an explicit and simple prediction rule. Our second method, the blocked Gibbs sampler, is based on an entirely different approach that works by directly sampling values from the posterior of the random measure. The blocked Gibbs sampler can be viewed as a more general approach because it works without requiring an explicit prediction rule. We find that the blocked Gibbs avoids some of the limitations seen with the Pólya urn approach and should be simpler for nonexperts to use.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Bayesian Analysis of Some Nonparametric Problems
Ferguson, T. S. (1973) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1176342360 · Cited by 4,697
Markov Chain Sampling Methods for Dirichlet Process Mixture Models
Neal, R. M. (2000) · Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics · doi:10.1080/10618600.2000.10474879 · Cited by 2,288
Bayesian Density Estimation and Inference Using Mixtures
Escobar, M. D., & West, M. (1995) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1995.10476550 · Cited by 2,255
Mixtures of Dirichlet Processes with Applications to Bayesian Nonparametric Problems
Antoniak, C. E. (1974) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1176342871 · Cited by 1,972
A Constructive Definition of Dirichlet Priors
Sethuraman, J. (1991) · doi:10.21236/ada238689 · Cited by 1,572
Ferguson Distributions Via Polya Urn Schemes
Blackwell, D., & MacQueen, J. B. (1973) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1176342372 · Cited by 1,329
The two-parameter Poisson-Dirichlet distribution derived from a stable subordinator
Pitman, J., & Yor, M. (1997) · The Annals of Probability · doi:10.1214/aop/1024404422 · Cited by 1,202
Scandinavian Journal of Statistics
(2010) · Scandinavian Journal of Statistics · doi:10.1111/(issn)1467-9469 · Cited by 976
Estimating Mixture of Dirichlet Process Models
Maceachern, S. N., & Müller, P. (1998) · Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics · doi:10.1080/10618600.1998.10474772 · Cited by 576
Estimating Normal Means with a Dirichlet Process Prior
Escobar, M. D. (1994) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1994.10476468 · Cited by 565
Cited by
Hierarchical Dirichlet Processes
Teh, Y. W., Jordan, M. I., Beal, M. J., & Blei, D. M. (2006) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/016214506000000302 · Cited by 2,120
Variational inference for Dirichlet process mixtures
Blei, D. M., & Jordan, M. I. (2006) · Bayesian Analysis · doi:10.1214/06-ba104 · Cited by 1,438
Lartillot, N., Rodrigue, N., Stubbs, D., & Richer, J. (2013) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1093/sysbio/syt022 · Cited by 871
SAINT: probabilistic scoring of affinity purification–mass spectrometry data
Choi, H., Larsen, B., Lin, Z.-Y., Breitkreutz, A., Mellacheruvu, D., Fermin, D., Qin, Z. S., Tyers, M., Gingras, A.-C., & Nesvizhskii, A. I. (2011) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.1541 · Cited by 800
A hierarchical Bayesian language model based on Pitman-Yor processes
Teh, Y. W. (2006) · Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Computational Linguistics and the 44th annual meeting of the ACL - ACL '06 · doi:10.3115/1220175.1220299 · Cited by 489
Metadata
- Authors
- Ishwaran, H., & James, L. F.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Statistical Association
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2001-03
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 453
- Pages
- 161-173
- ISSN
- 0162-1459 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-274X
- OpenAlex
- W2072169887
- Cited by
- 1,511
- References
- 31
- FWCI
- 11.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gibbs Sampling Methods for Stick-Breaking Priors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1198/016214501750332758
- The paper
- Ishwaran, H., & James, L. F. (2001). Gibbs Sampling Methods for Stick-Breaking Priors. Journal of the American Statistical Association. https://doi.org/10.1198/016214501750332758
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.