Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 160

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Decision Support Systems in Oncology

Open access
Walsh, Seán, de Jong, Evelyn E.C., van Timmeren, Janna E., Ibrahim, Abdalla, Compter, Inge, Peerlings, Jurgen, Sanduleanu, Sebastian, Refaee, Turkey, Keek, Simon, Larue, Ruben T.H.M., van Wijk, Yvonka, Even, Aniek J.G., Jochems, Arthur, Barakat, Mohamed S., Leijenaar, Ralph T.H., Lambin, Philippe·2019·JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics

Abstract

Precision medicine is the future of health care: please watch the animation at https://vimeo.com/241154708 . As a technology-intensive and -dependent medical discipline, oncology will be at the vanguard of this impending change. However, to bring about precision medicine, a fundamental conundrum must be solved: Human cognitive capacity, typically constrained to five variables for decision making in the context of the increasing number of available biomarkers and therapeutic options, is a limiting factor to the realization of precision medicine. Given this level of complexity and the restriction of human decision making, current methods are untenable. A solution to this challenge is multifactorial decision support systems (DSSs), continuously learning artificial intelligence platforms that integrate all available data—clinical, imaging, biologic, genetic, cost—to produce validated predictive models. DSSs compare the personalized probable outcomes—toxicity, tumor control, quality of life, cost effectiveness—of various care pathway decisions to ensure optimal efficacy and economy. DSSs can be integrated into the workflows both strategically (at the multidisciplinary tumor board level to support treatment choice, eg, surgery or radiotherapy) and tactically (at the specialist level to support treatment technique, eg, prostate spacer or not). In some countries, the reimbursement of certain treatments, such as proton therapy, is already conditional on the basis that a DSS is used. DSSs have many stakeholders—clinicians, medical directors, medical insurers, patient advocacy groups—and are a natural consequence of big data in health care. Here, we provide an overview of DSSs, their challenges, opportunities, and capacity to improve clinical decision making, with an emphasis on the utility in oncology.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/cci.18.00001

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 160

Metadata

Authors
Walsh, S., de Jong, E. E. C., van Timmeren, J. E., Ibrahim, A., Compter, I., Peerlings, J., Sanduleanu, S., Refaee, T., Keek, S., Larue, R. T. H. M., van Wijk, Y., Even, A. J. G., Jochems, A., Barakat, M. S., Leijenaar, R. T. H., & Lambin, P.
Venue
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
Published
2019-12
Volume
3
Issue
3
Pages
1-9
ISSN
2473-4276 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2914531051
Cited by
160
References
4
FWCI
4.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Decision Support Systems in Oncology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/cci.18.00001
The paper
Walsh, S., de Jong, E. E. C., van Timmeren, J. E., Ibrahim, A., Compter, I., Peerlings, J., Sanduleanu, S., Refaee, T., Keek, S., Larue, R. T. H. M., van Wijk, Y., Even, A. J. G., Jochems, A., Barakat, M. S., Leijenaar, R. T. H., & Lambin, P. (2019). Decision Support Systems in Oncology. JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics. https://doi.org/10.1200/cci.18.00001

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.