Cited by 89Blockchain Technology Applications and SecurityPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in DataArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

Blockchain for Privacy Preserving and Trustworthy Distributed Machine Learning in Multicentric Medical Imaging (C-DistriM)

Open access
Zerka, Fadila, Urovi, Visara, Vaidyanathan, Akshayaa, Barakat, Samir, Leijenaar, Ralph T. H., Walsh, Sean, Gabrani-Juma, Hanif, Miraglio, Benjamin +3 more·2020·IEEE Access

Abstract

The utility of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in healthcare strongly depends upon the quality of the data used to build models, and the confidence in the predictions they generate. Access to sufficient amounts of high-quality data to build accurate and reliable models remains problematic owing to substantive legal and ethical constraints in making clinically relevant research data available offsite. New technologies such as distributed learning offer a pathway forward, but unfortunately tend to suffer from a lack of transparency, which undermines trust in what data are used for the analysis. To address such issues, we hypothesized that, a novel distributed learning that combines sequential distributed learning with a blockchain-based platform, namely Chained Distributed Machine learning C-DistriM, would be feasible and would give a similar result as a standard centralized approach. C-DistriM enables health centers to dynamically participate in training distributed learning models. We demonstrate C-DistriM using the NSCLC-Radiomics open data to predict two-year lung-cancer survival. A comparison of the performance of this distributed solution, evaluated in six different scenarios, and the centralized approach, showed no statistically significant difference (AUCs between central and distributed models), all DeLong tests yielded p -val >0.05. This methodology removes the need to blindly trust the computation in one specific server on a distributed learning network. This fusion of blockchain and distributed learning serves as a proof-of-concept to increase transparency, trust, and ultimately accelerate the adoption of AI in multicentric studies. We conclude that our blockchain-based model for sequential training on distributed datasets is a feasible approach, provides equivalent performance to the centralized approach.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/access.2020.3029445

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ISO/TC 204 is the main standard facilitating the systematic use of autonomous vehicle technology and delivers an extensive manual on the entire system and infrastructure elements of ITS.

    “The main standard facilitating the systematic use of autonomous vehicle technology in this context is ISO/TC 204, which delivers an extensive manual on the entire system and infrastructure elements of ITS [45], [79], [80].”

    From A Review of Trustworthy and Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) (2023) · cites this paper as [80]

    The Introduction discusses AI in medical imaging, and the Blockchain section discusses distributed learning infrastructure. Searches for ISO/TC 204, autonomous vehicles, and intelligent transportation systems found no passage addressing the claimed standard or its scope. Our copy therefore does not verify the attribution. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • According to Intel's analysis, automated cars would save commuters' annual travel time by 250 million hours and contribute to saving more than 500,000 lives solely in the United States between 2035 and 2045.

    “According to Intel's analysis on the anticipated merits of automated cars, the employment of such innovations on roadways would save commuters' annual travel time by 250 million hours and contribute to saving more than 500,000 lives, solely in The United States of America, between the years 2035-2045 [79], [80].”

    From A Review of Trustworthy and Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) (2023) · cites this paper as [80]

    The Abstract and Results discuss blockchain-based distributed learning for medical imaging, not automated cars. Searches for Intel’s analysis, 250 million travel hours, 500,000 lives, and autonomous vehicles found no passage addressing the claim. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Crimi, S. Bakas, H. Kuijf, F. Keyvan, M. Reyes, and T. van Walsum, Eds. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2019, pp. 92-104.
  2. T. M. Mitchell, Machine Learning. New York, NY, USA: McGraw-Hill, 1997.
  3. H. J. W. L. Aerts, E. R. Velazquez, R. T. H. Leijenaar, C. Parmar, P. Grossmann, S. Carvalho, J. Bussink, R. Monshouwer, B. Haibe-Kains, D. Rietveld, F. Hoebers, M. M. Rietbergen, C. R. Leemans, A. Dekker, J. Quackenbush, R. J. Gillies, and P. Lambin, ''Data from NSCLC-radiomics [data set],'' Cancer Imag. Arch., 2019, doi: 10.7937/K9/TCIA.2015.PF0M9REI. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zerka, F., Urovi, V., Vaidyanathan, A., Barakat, S., Leijenaar, R. T. H., Walsh, S., Gabrani-Juma, H., Miraglio, B., Woodruff, H. C., Dumontier, M., & Lambin, P.
Affiliations
  • Maastricht University (NL)
  • Maastricht University Medical Centre (NL)
Venue
IEEE Access
Published
2020
Volume
8
Pages
183939-183951
ISSN
2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3091851474
Cited by
89
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 7
FWCI
10.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Access (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • ERC advanced Grant (ERC-ADG-2015, n◦ 694812 - Hypoximmuno)
  • Dutch Technology Foundation STW (Grant n◦ P14-19 Radiomics STRaTegy), which is the applied science division of NWO, Aspasia NWO (n◦91716421)
  • Technology Program of the Ministry of Economic Affairs
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords
blockchain, distributed learning, privacy preservation, radiomics, data transparency, trust in AI

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review