Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,283

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Local Consolidative Therapy Vs. Maintenance Therapy or Observation for Patients With Oligometastatic Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Long-Term Results of a Multi-Institutional, Phase II, Randomized Study

Open access
Gomez, Daniel R., Tang, Chad, Zhang, Jianjun, Blumenschein, George R., Hernandez, Mike, Lee, J. Jack, Ye, Rong, Palma, David A., Louie, Alexander V., Camidge, D. Ross, Doebele, Robert C., Skoulidis, Ferdinandos, Gaspar, Laurie E., Welsh, James W., Gibbons, Don L., Karam, Jose A., Kavanagh, Brian D., Tsao, Anne S., Sepesi, Boris, Swisher, Stephen G., Heymach, John V.·2019·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

PURPOSE: Our previously published findings reported that local consolidative therapy (LCT) with radiotherapy or surgery improved progression-free survival (PFS) and delayed new disease in patients with oligometastatic non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that did not progress after front-line systemic therapy. Herein, we present the longer-term overall survival (OS) results accompanied by additional secondary end points. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This multicenter, randomized, phase II trial enrolled patients with stage IV NSCLC, three or fewer metastases, and no progression at 3 or more months after front-line systemic therapy. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to maintenance therapy or observation (MT/O) or to LCT to all active disease sites. The primary end point was PFS; secondary end points were OS, toxicity, and the appearance of new lesions. All analyses were two sided, and P values less than .10 were deemed significant. RESULTS: The Data Safety and Monitoring Board recommended early trial closure after 49 patients were randomly assigned because of a significant PFS benefit in the LCT arm. With an updated median follow-up time of 38.8 months (range, 28.3 to 61.4 months), the PFS benefit was durable (median, 14.2 months [95% CI, 7.4 to 23.1 months] with LCT v 4.4 months [95% CI, 2.2 to 8.3 months] with MT/O; P = .022). We also found an OS benefit in the LCT arm (median, 41.2 months [95% CI, 18.9 months to not reached] with LCT v 17.0 months [95% CI, 10.1 to 39.8 months] with MT/O; P = .017). No additional grade 3 or greater toxicities were observed. Survival after progression was longer in the LCT group (37.6 months with LCT v 9.4 months with MT/O; P = .034). Of the 20 patients who experienced progression in the MT/O arm, nine received LCT to all lesions after progression, and the median OS was 17 months (95% CI, 7.8 months to not reached). CONCLUSION: In patients with oligometastatic NSCLC that did not progress after front-line systemic therapy, LCT prolonged PFS and OS relative to MT/O.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.19.00201

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Cited by

See all 1,283

Metadata

Authors
Gomez, D. R., Tang, C., Zhang, J., Blumenschein, G. R., Hernandez, M., Lee, J. J., Ye, R., Palma, D. A., Louie, A. V., Camidge, D. R., Doebele, R. C., Skoulidis, F., Gaspar, L. E., Welsh, J. W., Gibbons, D. L., Karam, J. A., Kavanagh, B. D., Tsao, A. S., Sepesi, B., Swisher, S. G., & Heymach, J. V.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2019-06-20
Volume
37
Issue
18
Pages
1558-1565
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2944301866
Cited by
1,283
References
7
FWCI
112.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Local Consolidative Therapy Vs. Maintenance Therapy or Observation for Patients With Oligometastatic Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Long-Term Results of a Multi-Institutional, Phase II, Randomized Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.19.00201
The paper
Gomez, D. R., Tang, C., Zhang, J., Blumenschein, G. R., Hernandez, M., Lee, J. J., Ye, R., Palma, D. A., Louie, A. V., Camidge, D. R., Doebele, R. C., Skoulidis, F., Gaspar, L. E., Welsh, J. W., Gibbons, D. L., Karam, J. A., Kavanagh, B. D., Tsao, A. S., Sepesi, B., . . . Heymach, J. V. (2019). Local Consolidative Therapy Vs. Maintenance Therapy or Observation for Patients With Oligometastatic Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Long-Term Results of a Multi-Institutional, Phase II, Randomized Study. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.19.00201

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.