The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Psychosocial problems among survivors of Hodgkin's disease.
Abstract
The psychosocial problems that develop in long-term survivors of Hodgkin's disease were examined in a cross-sectional survey of 403 patients. The average age at treatment was 27 years and at interview was 36 years. The median time since treatment was 9 years. Sixty percent of the patients were treated for stage I or II disease and 40% for stage III or IV. Eighty-two percent of the patients had never relapsed, and 98% were free of disease at the time of interview. The study investigated the type and frequency of problems by means of a self-administered questionnaire using standard survey items to assess disruption in three areas of life: sense of well-being, family relationships, and employment. Results indicate that energy had not returned to patients' satisfaction in 37% of the cases. This was influenced by age, time since therapy, stage of disease, and type of treatment. Patients with self-reported energy loss were more likely to be depressed. Moderately high divorce rates (32%), problems with infertility (18%), and less interest in sexual activity (20%) were reported. Employment patterns favored men returning to work, and number of hours worked was highly correlated with less depression, younger age, and return of energy. Difficulties at work were reported by 42% of the cases. The interaction of treatment, biologic, psychosocial, and functional variables is described.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Smets, E., Garssen, B., Schuster-Uitterhoeve, A., & de Haes, J. (1993) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/bjc.1993.319 · Cited by 346
Morrow, G. R., Hickok, J. T., Roscoe, J. A., Raubertas, R. F., Andrews, P. L. R., Flynn, P. J., Hynes, H. E., Banerjee, T. K., Kirshner, J. J., & King, D. K. (2003) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2003.04.070 · Cited by 324
Skarstein, J., Aass, N., Fosså, S. D., Skovlund, E., & Dahl, A. A. (2000) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/s0022-3999(00)00080-5 · Cited by 301
Fatigue in primary biliary cirrhosis
Cauch-Dudek, K., Abbey, S., Stewart, D. E., & Heathcote, E. J. (1998) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gut.43.5.705 · Cited by 237
Psychological Distress in Long-term Survivors of Adult-Onset Cancer: Results From a National Survey
Hoffman, K. E., McCarthy, E. P., Recklitis, C. J., & Ng, A. K. (2009) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2009.179 · Cited by 229
Cancer related fatigue: a focus on breast cancer and Hodgkin’s disease survivors
Ganz, P. A., & Bower, J. E. (2007) · Acta Oncologica · doi:10.1080/02841860701367845 · Cited by 88
Conceptualization of disease timeline predicts posttreatment distress in breast cancer patients
Rabin, C., Leventhal, H., & Goodin, S. (2004) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/0278-6133.23.4.407 · Cited by 80
Beeber, L. S., Shea, J., & McCorkle, R. (1998) · Journal of Psychosocial Oncology · doi:10.1300/j077v16n01_01 · Cited by 69
Evaluation of adjuvant psychological therapy for clinically referred cancer patients
Greer, S., Moorey, S., & Baruch, J. (1991) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/bjc.1991.60 · Cited by 54
Goo, A.-J., Song, Y.-M., Shin, J., & Ko, H. (2016) · Korean Journal of Family Medicine · doi:10.4082/kjfm.2016.37.4.228 · Cited by 11
“Subjects were split into 3 groups (low [9–17], intermediate [18–30], and high [31–63]) according to FSS score distribution (9–63 points).”
Method
Metadata
- Authors
- Fobair, P., Hoppe, R. T., Bloom, J., Cox, R., Varghese, A., & Spiegel, D.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 1986-05
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 805-814
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2161488267
- Cited by
- 363
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.