The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Comparison of neuropsychologic functioning and clinical indicators of neurotoxicity in long-term survivors of childhood leukemia given cranial radiation or parenteral methotrexate: a prospective study.
Abstract
We prospectively compared neuropsychologic functioning and clinical indicators of neurotoxicity in 49 consecutive childhood leukemia patients in long-term continuous complete remission (CR) who had received two different regimens of CNS prophylaxis by random assignment. Twenty-three patients were treated with 1,800 cGy cranial radiation and intrathecal methotrexate (RT group) and 26 with parenteral methotrexate only (MTX group). Over half of the RT group had somnolence syndrome, and four developed cerebral calcifications late in their clinical course. Abnormal electroencephalograms (EEGs) were seen in 15 patients in the MTX group, and six had early, transient white-matter hypodensities apparent on computed tomographic (CT) scans. Mean scores on standard tests of intelligence and academic achievement, administered after remission induction and again at a median of 6 years after treatment cessation, did not differ significantly between the two groups. However, statistically significant decreases in overall and verbal intelligence quotients (IQs) and in arithmetic achievement were found within both treatment groups. Sixteen of 26 in the MTX group and 14 of the 23 in the RT group had clinically important decreases (greater than or equal to 15 points) on one or more neuropsychologic measures. These changes did not correlate with findings on CT scans, EEGs, or other clinical signs of neurotoxicity. We conclude that 1,800 cGy cranial radiation and parenteral methotrexate, as used in this study, are associated with comparable decreases in neuropsychologic function.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
BUTLER, R. W., & COPELAND, D. R. (2002) · Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society · doi:10.1017/s1355617701020112 · Cited by 320
Cancer survivorship research: State of knowledge, challenges and opportunities
Aziz, N. M. (2007) · Acta Oncologica · doi:10.1080/02841860701367878 · Cited by 310
Neurocognitive effects of treatment for childhood cancer
Butler, R. W., & Haser, J. K. (2006) · Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews · doi:10.1002/mrdd.20110 · Cited by 203
(2005) · PubMed Central · Cited by 117
Neurocognitive and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Adult Survivors of Childhood Osteosarcoma
Edelmann, M. N., Daryani, V. M., Bishop, M. W., Liu, W., Brinkman, T. M., Stewart, C. F., Mulrooney, D. A., Kimberg, C., Ness, K. K., Cheung, Y. T., et al. (2016) · JAMA Oncology · doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.4398 · Cited by 55
Metadata
- Authors
- Ochs, J., Mulhern, R., Fairclough, D., Parvey, L., Whitaker, J., Ch'ien, L., Mauer, A., & Simone, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 1991-01
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 145-151
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W1877251196
- Cited by
- 283
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of neuropsychologic functioning and clinical indicators of neurotoxicity in long-term survivors of childhood leukemia given cranial radiation or parenteral methotrexate: a prospective study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.1991.9.1.145
- The paper
- Ochs, J., Mulhern, R., Fairclough, D., Parvey, L., Whitaker, J., Ch'ien, L., Mauer, A., & Simone, J. (1991). Comparison of neuropsychologic functioning and clinical indicators of neurotoxicity in long-term survivors of childhood leukemia given cranial radiation or parenteral methotrexate: a prospective study. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.1991.9.1.145
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.