The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Phase II study of estramustine and vinblastine, two microtubule inhibitors, in hormone-refractory prostate cancer.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Estramustine phosphate (EMP) and vinblastine are two microtubule inhibitors with distinct molecular targets and at least additive antimicrotubule effects in vitro. Their modest single-agent activities in hormone-refractory prostate cancer, nonoverlapping toxicities, and lack of cross-resistance prompted a phase II trial in hormone-refractory prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-six assessable patients at the Fox Chase Cancer Center and seven Fox Chase Cancer Center Network institutions were treated with oral EMP 600 mg/m2 on days 1 to 42 and vinblastine 4 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) once a week for 6 weeks. Courses were repeated every 8 weeks. Response assessment was based on a change in serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels and was correlated with change in pain scores. RESULTS: PSA decreased from baseline by at least 50% in 22 patients (61.1%) and by > or = 75% in eight patients (22.2%). A 50% or more decrease in PSA on three successive 2-week measurements together with an improved or stable pain score, performance status, and measurable soft tissue disease (if present) was required for a partial response (PR), which occurred in 11 patients for an overall response rate of 30.5% (95% confidence interval, 15.6% to 45.6%). In seven patients with measurable nonosseous disease, there was one PR (14%) and one minor response (MR). In 28 patients with assessable pain, major pain responses occurred in 12 (42.9%). PSA response (> or = 50% decrease times three measurements) was predictive of major pain response with a 93.7% specificity, a 50% sensitivity, and a positive predictive value of 85.7%. CONCLUSION: We conclude that EMP and vinblastine is an active combination in hormone-refractory prostate cancer.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Microtubules as a target for anticancer drugs
Jordan, M. A., & Wilson, L. (2004) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc1317 · Cited by 4,000
A history of prostate cancer treatment.
Denmeade, S. R., & Isaacs, J. T. (2002) · Nature reviews. Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc801 · Cited by 591
Hudes, G. R., Nathan, F., Khater, C., Haas, N., Cornfield, M., Giantonio, B., Greenberg, R., Gomella, L., Litwin, S., Ross, E., et al. (1997) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.1997.15.9.3156 · Cited by 272
Self-citationEhteda, A., Galettis, P., Pillai, K., & Morris, D. L. (2013) · BMC Cancer · doi:10.1186/1471-2407-13-86 · Cited by 44
Phase II study of topotecan in metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer
Hudes, G. R., Kosierowski, R., Greenberg, R., Ramsey, H. E., Fox, S. C., Ozols, R. F., McAleer, C. A., & Giantonio, B. J. (1995) · Investigational New Drugs · doi:10.1007/bf00873806 · Cited by 32
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Hudes, G. R., Greenberg, R., Krigel, R. L., Fox, S., Scher, R., Litwin, S., Watts, P., Speicher, L., Tew, K., & Comis, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 1992-11
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1754-1761
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2177330869
- Cited by
- 256
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phase II study of estramustine and vinblastine, two microtubule inhibitors, in hormone-refractory prostate cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.1992.10.11.1754
- The paper
- Hudes, G. R., Greenberg, R., Krigel, R. L., Fox, S., Scher, R., Litwin, S., Watts, P., Speicher, L., Tew, K., & Comis, R. (1992). Phase II study of estramustine and vinblastine, two microtubule inhibitors, in hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.1992.10.11.1754
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.