Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 272

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Phase II trial of 96-hour paclitaxel plus oral estramustine phosphate in metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer.

Hudes, G R, Nathan, F, Khater, C, Haas, N, Cornfield, M, Giantonio, B, Greenberg, R, Gomella, L, Litwin, S, Ross, E, Roethke, S, McAleer, C·1997·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the antitumor activity of 96-hour paclitaxel and daily oral estramustine phosphate (EMP) in patients with metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-four patients with adenocarcinoma of the prostate that progressed after one or more hormonal therapies and a trial of antiandrogen withdrawal were enrolled onto this phase II trial. Patients received paclitaxel 120 mg/m2 by 96-hour intravenous (i.v.) infusion on days 1 through 4 of each 21-day cycle, together with daily oral EMP 600 mg/m2/d, continuously. RESULTS: Four of nine patients with measurable disease had objective responses (one complete response [CR] and three partial responses [PRs]) in liver (two patients) or nodes (two patients) of 2, 6, 8, and 20 months' duration. Of 25 assessable patients with metastases limited to bone, 14 had a > or = 50% decline in pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level sustained for at least 6 weeks and seven had a > or = 80% decline. Overall, 17 of 32 patients (53.1%) with elevated pretreatment PSA levels had a > or = 50% decline of PSA and nine (28.1%) had a > or = 80% decrease. The main toxicities (> or = grade 2) were nausea, fluid retention, and fatigue, which occurred in 33%, 33%, and 24.2% of patients. Median time to progression, based on increasing PSA level and other clinical criteria, was 22.5 weeks. The estimated median overall survival time is 69 weeks. CONCLUSION: The combination of EMP and 96-hour paclitaxel is an active regimen for patients with HRPC. These results further support the therapeutic strategy of combining agents that impair microtubule function by complementary mechanisms.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.1997.15.9.3156

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 18 references

Cited by

See all 272

Metadata

Authors
Hudes, G. R., Nathan, F., Khater, C., Haas, N., Cornfield, M., Giantonio, B., Greenberg, R., Gomella, L., Litwin, S., Ross, E., Roethke, S., & McAleer, C.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
1997-09
Volume
15
Issue
9
Pages
3156-3163
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W1816774827
Cited by
272
References
18
FWCI
20.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phase II trial of 96-hour paclitaxel plus oral estramustine phosphate in metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.1997.15.9.3156
The paper
Hudes, G. R., Nathan, F., Khater, C., Haas, N., Cornfield, M., Giantonio, B., Greenberg, R., Gomella, L., Litwin, S., Ross, E., Roethke, S., & McAleer, C. (1997). Phase II trial of 96-hour paclitaxel plus oral estramustine phosphate in metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.1997.15.9.3156

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.