Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 358

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cisplatin neurotoxicity: the relationship between dosage, time, and platinum concentration in neurologic tissues, and morphologic evidence of toxicity.

Gregg, R W, Molepo, J M, Monpetit, V J, Mikael, N Z, Redmond, D, Gadia, M, Stewart, D J·1992·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

PURPOSE: To identify the major sites of platinum accumulation within neural tissues after treatment with cisplatin and to determine the relationship between cumulative dosage, time, and the development of histopathological and clinical neurotoxicity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-one patients treated antemortem with cisplatin had neural tissue harvested at autopsy. Neural tissues were assayed for platinum and examined for histopathologic evidence of neurotoxicity. The relationship between histopathologic neurotoxicity and various pharmacologic parameters was analyzed. RESULTS: Tissue platinum levels were found to be highest in the dorsal root ganglia and lowest in tissue protected by the blood-brain barrier. For peripheral nerve, dorsal root, and dorsal root ganglia, a linear relationship was observed between platinum levels and cumulative dose. Platinum levels in neural tissue were not observed to decrease with time. Histopathologic toxicity closely matched an index of exposure to platinum (cumulative dose and log of time). Clinical and histopathologic neurotoxicity was found to occur with higher accumulations of platinum, with the highest levels found in patients with clinical evidence of neurotoxicity. CONCLUSIONS: The dorsal root ganglia was the most vulnerable neural structure. This is consistent with the clinical presentation of sensory neuropathy in cisplatin neurotoxicity. Central structures of the spinal cord and brain were protected from platinum accumulation. The increasing histopathologic toxicity, with an index of exposure to platinum, suggests that it is retained indefinitely in an actively neurotoxic form. The pharmacologic parameters examined correlate with the development of and are consistent with the clinical and laboratory features of cisplatin neurotoxicity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.1992.10.5.795

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 358

Metadata

Authors
Gregg, R. W., Molepo, J. M., Monpetit, V. J., Mikael, N. Z., Redmond, D., Gadia, M., & Stewart, D. J.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
1992-05
Volume
10
Issue
5
Pages
795-803
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W1832113570
Cited by
358
References
1
FWCI
3.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cisplatin neurotoxicity: the relationship between dosage, time, and platinum concentration in neurologic tissues, and morphologic evidence of toxicity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.1992.10.5.795
The paper
Gregg, R. W., Molepo, J. M., Monpetit, V. J., Mikael, N. Z., Redmond, D., Gadia, M., & Stewart, D. J. (1992). Cisplatin neurotoxicity: the relationship between dosage, time, and platinum concentration in neurologic tissues, and morphologic evidence of toxicity. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.1992.10.5.795

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.