The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Specific detection of carcinoembryonic antigen-expressing tumor cells in bone marrow aspirates by polymerase chain reaction.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To establish a sensitive assay for the specific detection of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA)-expressing tumor cells in the bone marrow of patients with colorectal cancer and other CEA-positive carcinomas. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A CEA-specific nested reverse transcriptase (RT) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay was developed and optimized using limiting dilutions of a CEA-positive cancer cell line mixed with normal bone marrow cell specimens. The optimized test was then used to examine bone marrow samples obtained from 15 patients with abdominal carcinomas (colorectal, n = 10; pancreatic, n = 3; gastric, n = 2) and six patients with breast cancer. Specificity was assessed by examination of 56 negative controls (malignant hematologic disease, n = 28; nonmalignant disease conditions, n = 5; healthy bone marrow donors, n = 8; normal peripheral-blood samples, n = 15). For 11 patients with abdominal carcinomas, immunostaining evaluations were performed using an anti-CEA and an anticytokeratin antibody, and the results compared with the nested PCR assay. RESULTS: In the sensitivity calibration system, single CEA-expressing tumor cells were detected in 2 to 5 x 10(7) normal bone marrow cells. All 56 control samples failed to amplify. This demonstrates that mRNAs coding for highly homologous CEA-related antigens expressed by various lineages of blood cells do not interfere. Bone marrow samples from 10 of 15 patients with abdominal cancers and four of six breast cancer patients scored positive, indicating micrometastatic bone disease. Four of 11 samples from the gastrointestinal cancer patients were found to be positive by the PCR method, but were negative with the immunocytology method. CONCLUSION: Since approximately 30% of the colorectal carcinoma patients that score negative in immunocytology staining of bone marrow samples have been reported to relapse, earlier diagnosis of the presence of malignant cells is needed. Our result that samples scoring positive in the described CEA-specific PCR test remained negative by two immunostaining methods suggests a higher sensitivity. We conclude that PCR amplification of CEA mRNA may lead to an earlier diagnosis of micrometastatic bone disease in patients with CEA-expressing carcinomas.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Emerging molecular markers of cancer
Sidransky, D. (2002) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc755 · Cited by 662
Zippelius, A., Kufer, P., Honold, G., Köllermann, M. W., Oberneder, R., Schlimok, G., Riethmüller, G., & Pantel, K. (1997) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.1997.15.7.2701 · Cited by 277
Metadata
- Authors
- Gerhard, M., Juhl, H., Kalthoff, H., Schreiber, H. W., Wagener, C., & Neumaier, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 1994-04
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 725-729
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W161630099
- Cited by
- 373
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Specific detection of carcinoembryonic antigen-expressing tumor cells in bone marrow aspirates by polymerase chain reaction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.1994.12.4.725
- The paper
- Gerhard, M., Juhl, H., Kalthoff, H., Schreiber, H. W., Wagener, C., & Neumaier, M. (1994). Specific detection of carcinoembryonic antigen-expressing tumor cells in bone marrow aspirates by polymerase chain reaction. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.1994.12.4.725
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.