Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 277

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Limitations of reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction analyses for detection of micrometastatic epithelial cancer cells in bone marrow.

Zippelius, A, Kufer, P, Honold, G, Köllermann, M W, Oberneder, R, Schlimok, G, Riethmüller, G, Pantel, K·1997·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study was designed to evaluate the potential of reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analyses for the detection of micrometastatic carcinoma cells in bone marrow (BM). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The specificity of RT-PCR assays with primers specific for various tumor-associated and organ-specific mRNA species was examined by analysis of 53 BM aspirates from control patients with no epithelial malignancy. In addition, BM samples from 63 patients with prostate cancer (n = 53) or breast cancer (n = 10) were analyzed by RT-PCR with primers specific for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) mRNA. As a reference method, all samples were analyzed simultaneously by an established immunocytochemical assay, using monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against cytokeratins (CK) for tumor-cell detection. RESULTS: Seven of eight marker species could be detected in a considerable number of BM samples from control patients: epithelial glycoprotein-40 (EGP-40; 53 of 53 samples), desmoplakin I (DPI I; five of five), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA; five of 19), erb-B2 (five of seven), erb-B3 (six of seven), prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSM; four of nine), and CK18 (five of seven). Only PSA mRNA was not detected in any of the 53 control BM samples. In serial dilution experiments, the PSA RT-PCR assay was able to detect five LNCaP prostate carcinoma cells in 4 x 10(6) BM cells. CK-positive cells were found in 20 patients (37.7%) with prostate cancer, while PSA mRNA was found in only 15 (28.3%; P = .04). Moreover, despite the recent observation that PSA is also expressed in mammary carcinomas, none of the 10 CK-positive BM samples were PSA mRNA-positive. CONCLUSION: Limiting factors in the detection of micrometastatic tumor cells by RT-PCR are (1) the illegitimate transcription of tumor-associated or epithelial-specific genes in hematopoietic cells, and (2) the deficient expression of the marker gene in micrometastatic tumor cells.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.1997.15.7.2701

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 25 references

Cited by

See all 277

Metadata

Authors
Zippelius, A., Kufer, P., Honold, G., Köllermann, M. W., Oberneder, R., Schlimok, G., Riethmüller, G., & Pantel, K.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
1997-07
Volume
15
Issue
7
Pages
2701-2708
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W1834558432
Cited by
277
References
25
FWCI
9.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Limitations of reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction analyses for detection of micrometastatic epithelial cancer cells in bone marrow. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.1997.15.7.2701
The paper
Zippelius, A., Kufer, P., Honold, G., Köllermann, M. W., Oberneder, R., Schlimok, G., Riethmüller, G., & Pantel, K. (1997). Limitations of reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction analyses for detection of micrometastatic epithelial cancer cells in bone marrow. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.1997.15.7.2701

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.