The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Combination chemotherapy versus melphalan plus prednisone as treatment for multiple myeloma: an overview of 6,633 patients from 27 randomized trials. Myeloma Trialists' Collaborative Group.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare combination chemotherapy (CCT) versus melphalan plus prednisone (MP) as treatment for multiple myeloma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a collaborative worldwide overview of randomized trials of CCT versus MP, individual patient data on 4,930 patients from 20 trials were analyzed, with the addition of published data on a further 1,703 patients from seven trials. The main outcome measure was mortality, with response and recurrence rates being subsidiary end points. RESULTS: Taking all of the trials together, response rates were significantly higher with CCT than with MP (60.0% v 53.2%; P < .00001, two-tailed). There was no evidence of any difference in mortality between CCT and MP, with a nonsignificant 1.5% reduction in death rate in favor of CCT (P = .6, two-tailed). There is heterogeneity of design between the trials, but subgroup analyses by type of CCT or by dose-intensities of CCT, of melphalan, or of prednisone did not identify any particular forms of therapy that were either clearly beneficial or clearly adverse. Similarly, analysis of the presentation features of the patients did not find any categories in which CCT differed significantly from MP in its effects on mortality; in particular, there was no evidence that poor-risk patients benefited more from CCT. CONCLUSION: This overview found no difference, either overall or within any subgroup, in mortality between CCT and MP. In terms of survival, these therapeutic options, as tested in the trials considered, are approximately equivalent.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Review of 1027 Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma
Kyle, R. A., Gertz, M. A., Witzig, T. E., Lust, J. A., Lacy, M. Q., Dispenzieri, A., Fonseca, R., Rajkumar, S. V., Offord, J. R., Larson, D. R., et al. (2003) · Mayo Clinic Proceedings · doi:10.4065/78.1.21 · Cited by 2,447
Self-citationBortezomib plus Melphalan and Prednisone for Initial Treatment of Multiple Myeloma
San Miguel, J. F., Schlag, R., Khuageva, N. K., Dimopoulos, M. A., Shpilberg, O., Kropff, M., Spicka, I., Petrucci, M. T., Palumbo, A., Samoilova, O. S., et al. (2008) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0801479 · Cited by 1,899
Single versus Double Autologous Stem-Cell Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma
Attal, M., Harousseau, J.-L., Facon, T., Guilhot, F., Doyen, C., Fuzibet, J.-G., Monconduit, M., Hulin, C., Caillot, D., Bouabdallah, R., et al. (2003) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa032290 · Cited by 984
Rajkumar, S. V., Jacobus, S., Callander, N. S., Fonseca, R., Vesole, D. H., Williams, M. E., Abonour, R., Siegel, D. S., Katz, M., & Greipp, P. R. (2010) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(09)70284-0 · Cited by 933
Rajkumar, S. V., Blood, E., Vesole, D., Fonseca, R., & Greipp, P. R. (2006) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2005.03.0221 · Cited by 865
Metadata
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 1998-12
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 3832-3842
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W4241442958
- Cited by
- 433
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Combination chemotherapy versus melphalan plus prednisone as treatment for multiple myeloma: an overview of 6,633 patients from 27 randomized trials. Myeloma Trialists' Collaborative Group. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.1998.16.12.3832
- The paper
- Combination chemotherapy versus melphalan plus prednisone as treatment for multiple myeloma: an overview of 6,633 patients from 27 randomized trials. Myeloma Trialists' Collaborative Group. (1998). Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.1998.16.12.3832
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.