The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Emergency treatment of malignant extradural spinal cord compression: an evidence-based guideline.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To review the literature for malignant extradural spinal cord compression (MSCC), produce evidence-based recommendations based on the criteria used by the Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination, and make suggestions regarding future research directives. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature with explicit study selection and evaluation criteria was performed. Primary outcome measure was posttreatment ambulation rate. RESULTS: There is good evidence to support the use of high-dose dexamethasone (96 mg/d), but inconclusive evidence for the use of moderate-dose steroids (16 mg/d) in conjunction with radiotherapy (RT) for the treatment of MSCC. Fair evidence exists for not using steroids in patients who are nonparetic and ambulatory pretreatment, and to give radiation to patients with subclinical spinal cord compression (SCC). The remainder of the recommendations are based on inconclusive evidence: RT alone should be the first-line treatment for ambulatory patients except when there is spinal instability, bony compression, or paraplegia on presentation, in which case surgery should be performed. Either modality can be used for paraparetic patients who are nonambulatory. Postoperative RT should be considered for tumor in residua. Ambulatory, undiagnosed patients should have needle biopsy attempted first. Patients should be aggressively screened and educated about SCC. CONCLUSION: In general, there were very few papers of high methodologic quality found in the literature. More studies are needed to satisfy the validity of many of the clinical decisions that are made today with regard to the management of MSCC.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies
Deeks, J., Dinnes, J., D'Amico, R., Sowden, A., Sakarovitch, C., Song, F., Petticrew, M., & Altman, D. (2003) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta7270 · Cited by 2,907
Loblaw, D. A., Perry, J., Chambers, A., & Laperriere, N. J. (2005) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2005.00.067 · Cited by 325
Self-citationHoskin, P. J., Hopkins, K., Misra, V., Holt, T., McMenemin, R., Dubois, D., McKinna, F., Foran, B., Madhavan, K., MacGregor, C., et al. (2019) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2019.17913 · Cited by 120
Caring for children with advanced cancer
Wolfe, J., Friebert, S., & Hilden, J. (2002) · Pediatric Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/s0031-3955(02)00034-2 · Cited by 69
Metadata
- Authors
- Loblaw, D. A., & Laperriere, N. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 1998-04
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1613-1624
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2135287408
- Cited by
- 374
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Emergency treatment of malignant extradural spinal cord compression: an evidence-based guideline. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.1998.16.4.1613
- The paper
- Loblaw, D. A., & Laperriere, N. J. (1998). Emergency treatment of malignant extradural spinal cord compression: an evidence-based guideline. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.1998.16.4.1613
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.