Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 455

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sequence analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2: correlation of mutations with family history and ovarian cancer risk.

Frank, T S, Manley, S A, Olopade, O I, Cummings, S, Garber, J E, Bernhardt, B, Antman, K, Russo, D, Wood, M E, Mullineau, L, Isaacs, C, Peshkin, B, Buys, S, Venne, V, Rowley, P T, Loader, S, Offit, K, Robson, M, Hampel, H, Brener, D, Winer, E P, Clark, S, Weber, B, Strong, L C, Thomas, A·1998·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

PURPOSE: Previous studies of mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 have used detection methods that may underestimate the actual frequency of mutations and have analyzed women using heterogeneous criteria for risk of hereditary cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 238 women with breast cancer before age 50 or ovarian cancer at any age and at least one first- or second-degree relative with either diagnosis underwent sequence analysis of BRCA1 followed by analysis of BRCA2 (except for 27 women who declined analysis of BRCA2 after a deleterious mutation was discovered in BRCA1). Results were correlated with personal and family history of malignancy. RESULTS: Deleterious mutations were identified in 94 (39%) women, including 59 of 117 (50%) from families with ovarian cancer and 35 of 121 (29%) from families without ovarian cancer. Mutations were identified in 14 of 70 (20%) women with just one other relative who developed breast cancer before age 50. In women with breast cancer, mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 were associated with a 10-fold increased risk of subsequent ovarian carcinoma (P = .005). CONCLUSION: Because mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 in women with breast cancer are associated with an increased risk of ovarian cancer, analysis of these genes should be considered for women diagnosed with breast cancer who have a high probability of carrying a mutation according to the statistical model developed with these data.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.1998.16.7.2417

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 455

Metadata

Authors
Frank, T. S., Manley, S. A., Olopade, O. I., Cummings, S., Garber, J. E., Bernhardt, B., Antman, K., Russo, D., Wood, M. E., Mullineau, L., Isaacs, C., Peshkin, B., Buys, S., Venne, V, Rowley, P. T., Loader, S., Offit, K., Robson, M., Hampel, H., Brener, D., Winer, E. P., Clark, S., Weber, B., Strong, L. C., & Thomas, A.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
1998-07
Volume
16
Issue
7
Pages
2417-2425
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W1934378440
Cited by
455
References
1
FWCI
18.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sequence analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2: correlation of mutations with family history and ovarian cancer risk. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.1998.16.7.2417
The paper
Frank, T. S., Manley, S. A., Olopade, O. I., Cummings, S., Garber, J. E., Bernhardt, B., Antman, K., Russo, D., Wood, M. E., Mullineau, L., Isaacs, C., Peshkin, B., Buys, S., Venne, V, Rowley, P. T., Loader, S., Offit, K., Robson, M., Hampel, H., . . . Thomas, A. (1998). Sequence analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2: correlation of mutations with family history and ovarian cancer risk. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.1998.16.7.2417

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.