Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 264

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Vascular endothelial growth factor is of high prognostic value in node-negative breast carcinoma.

Linderholm, B, Tavelin, B, Grankvist, K, Henriksson, R·1998·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

PURPOSE: The prognostic value of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) protein, known to stimulate endothelial growth and angiogenesis, was evaluated in node-negative breast carcinoma (NNBC) and compared with established prognostic factors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In 525 consecutive patients with primary invasive NNBC (T1-2N0M0; tumor, node, metastasis stage), of whom 500 patients did not receive any systemic therapy, the cytosolic levels of VEGF165 were measured by using a quantitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The median follow-up was 46 months. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. RESULTS: VEGF level was significantly inversely correlated with estrogen receptor (ER) positivity but positively associated with tumor size and histologic grade. Patients with VEGF levels above the median value (2.40 pg/microg of DNA) showed a significantly shorter survival time (P=.0012) than patients with levels less than the median value, also when analyzed as a continuous variable (P=.0277). Tumor size, grade, and ER expression were all statistically significant for overall survival in univariate analyses (P=.0069, P=.014, and P < .001, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that VEGF level was the strongest predictor of overall survival (P=.0199). Histologic grade was also an independent predictor of survival (P=.0477). Among the 381 patients with ER-positive tumors, a group in general considered to have a good prognosis, we found a significant reduction in survival for those with levels of VEGF greater than the median value (P=.0009). CONCLUSION: The results suggest that the level of VEGF165 protein is an independent, strong prognostic factor for survival in patients with NNBC, especially in the subgroup of patients with ER positivity. Thus, cytosolic VEGF165 might be useful to select patients for adjuvant systemic therapy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.1998.16.9.3121

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 25 references

Cited by

See all 264

Metadata

Authors
Linderholm, B., Tavelin, B., Grankvist, K., & Henriksson, R.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
1998-09
Volume
16
Issue
9
Pages
3121-3128
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2235360519
Cited by
264
References
25
FWCI
5.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Vascular endothelial growth factor is of high prognostic value in node-negative breast carcinoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.1998.16.9.3121
The paper
Linderholm, B., Tavelin, B., Grankvist, K., & Henriksson, R. (1998). Vascular endothelial growth factor is of high prognostic value in node-negative breast carcinoma. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.1998.16.9.3121

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.