Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 445

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mitomycin, Ifosfamide, and Cisplatin in Unresectable Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Effects on Survival and Quality of Life

Cullen, M. H., Billingham, L. J., Woodroffe, C. M., Chetiyawardana, A. D., Gower, N. H., Joshi, R., Ferry, D. R., Rudd, R. M., Spiro, S. G., Cook, J. E., Trask, C., Bessell, E., Connolly, C. K., Tobias, J., Souhami, R. L.·1999·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

PURPOSE: Chemotherapy for non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains controversial. We describe the two largest reported, randomized, parallel trials designed to determine whether the addition of chemotherapy influences duration and quality of life in localized, unresectable (mitomycin, ifosfamide, cisplatin [MIC]1 trial) and extensive (MIC2 trial) disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ambulatory patients with NSCLC, aged 75 years or younger, with localized disease, were randomized in MIC1 to receive up to four cycles of chemotherapy (CT: mitomycin 6 mg/m 2, ifosfamide 3 g/m 2, and cisplatin 50 mg/m 2) every 21 days, followed by radical radiotherapy (CT + RT) or radiotherapy (RT) alone. Extensive-stage patients were randomized in MIC2 to identical chemotherapy plus palliative care (CT + PC) or palliative care (PC) alone. Short-term change in quality of life (QOL) was assessed in a subgroup of patients. Data from the two trials were combined to allow multivariate and stratified survival analyses. RESULTS: Seven hundred ninety-seven eligible patients were randomized, 446 in MIC1 and 351 in MIC2. MIC CT improved survival in both trials (significantly in MIC2). The median survival time in MIC1 was 11.7 months (CT + RT) versus 9.7 months (RT alone) (P = .14); whereas in MIC2, median survival time was 6.7 months (CT + PC) compared with 4.8 months (PC alone) (P = .03). QOL, assessed in 134 patients from start of trial to week 6, showed improvement with chemotherapy and deterioration with standard treatment. In the combined analysis of 797 randomized patients, the positive effect of MIC on survival was significant overall (P = .01) and after adjusting for prognostic factors (P = .01). CONCLUSION: MIC chemotherapy prolongs survival in unresectable NSCLC without compromising QOL.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.1999.17.10.3188

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 445

Metadata

Authors
Cullen, M. H., Billingham, L. J., Woodroffe, C. M., Chetiyawardana, A. D., Gower, N. H., Joshi, R., Ferry, D. R., Rudd, R. M., Spiro, S. G., Cook, J. E., Trask, C., Bessell, E., Connolly, C. K., Tobias, J., & Souhami, R. L.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
1999-10
Volume
17
Issue
10
Pages
3188-3194
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W1748441280
Cited by
445
References
2
FWCI
32.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mitomycin, Ifosfamide, and Cisplatin in Unresectable Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Effects on Survival and Quality of Life. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.1999.17.10.3188
The paper
Cullen, M. H., Billingham, L. J., Woodroffe, C. M., Chetiyawardana, A. D., Gower, N. H., Joshi, R., Ferry, D. R., Rudd, R. M., Spiro, S. G., Cook, J. E., Trask, C., Bessell, E., Connolly, C. K., Tobias, J., & Souhami, R. L. (1999). Mitomycin, Ifosfamide, and Cisplatin in Unresectable Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Effects on Survival and Quality of Life. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.1999.17.10.3188

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.