Cited by 612Lung Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentLung Cancer Treatments and MutationsLung Cancer Research Studies

Cisplatin- versus carboplatin-based chemotherapy in first-line treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: an individual patient data meta-analysis

Ardizzoni, A., Boni, L., Tiseo, M., Fossella, F. V., Schiller, J. H., Paesmans, M., Radosavljevic, D., Paccagnella, A. +4 more·2007·JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Because the efficacy of carboplatin and cisplatin in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has not been proven to be equivalent, an individual patient data meta-analysis comparing the two treatments was performed. METHODS: Randomized trials comparing carboplatin to cisplatin in first-line treatment of advanced NSCLC were identified and their electronic databases obtained. A general variance-based method was used to estimate the summary hazard ratios (HRs), odds ratios (ORs), and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for mortality, objective response, and toxicity. Cochran's chi-square test (Q test) was used to test for heterogeneity among trials, and the I2 index, which expresses the proportion of variability of the results due to heterogeneity, was calculated. A random-effects model that takes into account interstudy variation was also applied. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: Nine trials that included a total of 2968 patients were analyzed; overall median follow-up was 1021 days. The objective response rate was higher for patients treated with cisplatin than for patients treated with carboplatin (30% versus 24%, respectively; OR = 1.37; 95% CI = 1.16 to 1.61; P<.001). Carboplatin treatment was associated with a non-statistically significant increase in the hazard of mortality relative to treatment with cisplatin (HR = 1.07; 95% CI = 0.99 to 1.15; P = .100). In patients with nonsquamous tumors and those treated with third-generation chemotherapy, carboplatin-based chemotherapy was associated with a statistically significant increase in mortality (HR = 1.12; 95% CI = 1.01 to 1.23 and HR = 1.11; 95% CI = 1.01 to 1.21, respectively). Cisplatin-based chemotherapy was associated with more severe nausea and vomiting and nephrotoxicity; severe thrombocytopenia was more frequent during carboplatin-based chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Our individual patient data meta-analysis suggests that cisplatin-based chemotherapy is slightly superior to carboplatin-based chemotherapy in terms of response rate and, in certain subgroups, in prolonging survival without being associated with an increase in severe toxic effects. Therefore, cisplatin-based third-generation regimens should remain the standard reference for the treatment of selected patients with advanced-stage NSCLC and of those with earlier-stage disease.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jnci/djk196

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • One meta-analysis from individual patient data shows slightly longer overall survival for cisplatin-based versus carboplatin-based doublet in patients with non-squamous NSCLC treated with third-generation regimens.

    “One meta-analysis from individual patient data has shown slightly longer OS for cisplatin-based versus carboplatinbased doublet in patients with NSCC and treated with thirdgeneration regimens [I, B] [49].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ardizzoni, A., Boni, L., Tiseo, M., Fossella, F. V., Schiller, J. H., Paesmans, M., Radosavljevic, D., Paccagnella, A., Zatloukal, P., Mazzanti, P., Bisset, D., & Rosell, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Parma (IT)
  • The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
Venue
JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Published
2007-06-05
Volume
99
Issue
11
Pages
847-857
ISSN
  • 0027-8874 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2105
OpenAlex
W2113003672
Cited by
612
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 40 · 2014: 51 · 2013: 57 · 2012: 56
FWCI
7.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles) (submittedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Lung Cancer Research Studies
Keywords
cisplatin, carboplatin, non-small cell lung cancer, first-line chemotherapy, objective response rate, mortality, chemotherapy toxicity, nephrotoxicity, thrombocytopenia, nausea and vomiting, third-generation chemotherapy, subgroup analysis, treatment effect heterogeneity, random effects models, Cox proportional hazards model
MeSH terms
Antineoplastic Agents, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Cisplatin, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Survival Rate, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Carboplatin, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review