Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 173

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Analysis of the p53/BAX Pathway in Colorectal Cancer: Low BAX Is a Negative Prognostic Factor in Patients With Resected Liver Metastases

Sturm, Isrid, Köhne, Claus-Henning, Wolff, Gerhard, Petrowsky, Henrik, Hillebrand, Timo, Hauptmann, Steffen, Lorenz, Matthias, Dörken, Bernd, Daniel, Peter T.·1999·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the prognostic value of the central downstream apoptosis effector BAX in relation to its upstream regulator p53 in R0-resected hepatic metastases of colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 41 patients who underwent potentially curative resection of liver metastases from colorectal cancer was performed. Tumor DNA was screened for p53 mutations by single-stranded conformational polymorphism polymerase chain reaction and for BAX frameshift mutations by fragment length analysis. Protein expression of BAX, p21, and p53 was investigated by immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: Overall median survival was 40.2 months. Tumors with BAX frameshift mutations were considered microsatellite mutator phenotype–positive and were excluded from further prognostic analyses. Patients with high BAX protein expression had a median survival of 53.6 months compared with 35.4 months for patients with low BAX expression (P < .05). The negative prognostic value of low BAX expression was more evident in those patients with wild-type p53 (median survival, 54.0 v 23.3 months for BAX-negative tumors; P < .01). Low BAX expression was an independent negative prognostic marker in multivariate regression analysis for all patients independent of the p53 status (relative risk, 3.03, P = .03), especially for p53 wild-type tumors (relative risk, 8.21; P = .0095). CONCLUSION: We conclude that low BAX expression is an independent negative prognostic marker in patients with hepatic metastases of colorectal cancer. The best survival was seen in patients with an intact p53-to-BAX pathway; ie, wild-type p53- and BAX-positive tumors. Thus, analysis of apoptosis signaling pathways (here, p53 in concert with its downstream death effector, BAX) might yield more prognostic power in future studies as compared with analysis of single genes such as p53 alone.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.1999.17.5.1364

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 173

Metadata

Authors
Sturm, I., Köhne, C.-H., Wolff, G., Petrowsky, H., Hillebrand, T., Hauptmann, S., Lorenz, M., Dörken, B., & Daniel, P. T.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
1999-05
Volume
17
Issue
5
Pages
1364-1364
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2253032222
Cited by
173
References
3
FWCI
7.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analysis of the p53/BAX Pathway in Colorectal Cancer: Low BAX Is a Negative Prognostic Factor in Patients With Resected Liver Metastases. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.1999.17.5.1364
The paper
Sturm, I., Köhne, C.-H., Wolff, G., Petrowsky, H., Hillebrand, T., Hauptmann, S., Lorenz, M., Dörken, B., & Daniel, P. T. (1999). Analysis of the p53/BAX Pathway in Colorectal Cancer: Low BAX Is a Negative Prognostic Factor in Patients With Resected Liver Metastases. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.1999.17.5.1364

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.