The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Oral Medroxyprogesterone Acetate in the Treatment of Advanced or Recurrent Endometrial Carcinoma: A Dose-Response Study by the Gynecologic Oncology Group
Abstract
PURPOSE: Progestins have definite activity against advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma. Both parenteral and oral progestins yield similar serum levels and response rates, which range from 18% to 34%. The one major study that used oral medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) noted a response rate at the lower end of the range (18%) and much poorer progression-free and overall survival times (4 and 10.5 months, respectively) than previously reported. The present study sought to confirm this earlier study of oral MPA, to assess the importance of prognostic factors such as histologic grade and receptor levels, and to determine whether a higher dose of MPA would yield a higher response rate. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred ninety-nine eligible women with advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma were randomized to receive oral MPA either 200 mg/d or 1,000 mg/d until unacceptable toxicity intervened or their disease progressed. RESULTS: Among 145 patients receiving the low-dose regimen, there were 25 complete (17%) and 11 partial (8%) responses for an overall response rate of 25%. The 154 patients receiving the high-dose regimen experienced 14 (9%) complete and 10 (6%) partial responses for an overall response rate of 15%. Median durations of progression-free survival were 3.2 months and 2.5 months for the low-dose and high-dose regimens, respectively. Median survival durations were 11.1 months and 7.0 months, respectively. The adjusted relative odds of responding to the high-dose regimen compared with the low-dose regimen was 0.61 (90% confidence interval, 0.36 to 1.04). Prognostic factors having a significant impact on the probability of response included initial performance status, age, histologic grade, and progesterone receptor concentration. Compliance with oral therapy was documented with serum levels 1 month after starting therapy, when possible. MPA levels were commensurate with the assigned dose and schedule. CONCLUSION: Oral MPA is active against endometrial carcinoma. Response to progestin therapy is more frequent among patients with a well-differentiated histology and positive progesterone receptor status. This study provides no evidence to support the use of MPA 1,000 mg/d orally instead of MPA 200 mg/d orally. In fact, the trends suggest the opposite. The use of oral MPA 200 mg/d is a reasonable initial approach to the treatment of advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma, particularly those lesions that are well-differentiated and/or progesterone receptor-positive (> 50 fmol/mg cytosol protein). Patients with poorly differentiated and/or progesterone receptor levels less than 50 fmol/mg cytosol protein had only an 8% to 9% response rate.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations
Kaplan, E. L., & Meier, P. (1992) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-4380-9_25 · Cited by 45,181
Regression Models and Life-Tables
Cox, D. R. (1972) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1972.tb00899.x · Cited by 39,793
Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations
Kaplan, E. L., & Meier, P. (1958) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1958.10501452 · Cited by 39,158
Regression Models and Life-Tables
Cox, D. R. (1992) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-4380-9_37 · Cited by 26,297
Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions
Fleiss, J. L., Levin, B., & Paik, M. C. (2003) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/0471445428 · Cited by 18,646
Evaluation of survival data and two new rank order statistics arising in its consideration.
Mantel, N. (1966) · PubMed · Cited by 7,519
Parker, S. L., Tong, T., Bolden, S., & Wingo, P. A. (1997) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/canjclin.47.1.5 · Cited by 2,003
Progestational Agents in the Treatment of Carcinoma of the Endometrium
Kelley, R. M., & Baker, W. H. (1961) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm196102022640503 · Cited by 257
Martin, P., Rolland, P. H., GAMERRE, M., Serment, H., & Toga, M. (1979) · International Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1002/ijc.2910230309 · Cited by 133
Progestin Therapy of Endometrial, Breast and Ovarian Carcinoma: A review of clinical observations
Kauppila, A. (1984) · Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica · doi:10.3109/00016348409156700 · Cited by 115
Cited by
Fleming, G. F., Brunetto, V. L., Cella, D., Look, K. Y., Reid, G. C., Munkarah, A. R., Kline, R., Burger, R. A., Goodman, A., & Burks, R. T. (2004) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2004.07.184 · Cited by 565
Progesterone action in endometrial cancer, endometriosis, uterine fibroids, and breast cancer
Kim, J. J., Kurita, T., & Bulun, S. E. (2013) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/er.2012-1043 · Cited by 520
Makker, V., Rasco, D., Vogelzang, N. J., Brose, M. S., Cohn, A. L., Mier, J., Di Simone, C., Hyman, D. M., Stepan, D. E., Dutcus, C. E., et al. (2019) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(19)30020-8 · Cited by 476
Role of nuclear progesterone receptor isoforms in uterine pathophysiology
Patel, B., Elguero, S., Thakore, S., Dahoud, W., Bedaiwy, M., & Mesiano, S. (2015) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dmu056 · Cited by 353
Influence of Sex Hormones on Cancer Progression
Folkerd, E. J., & Dowsett, M. (2010) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2009.27.4290 · Cited by 229
Metadata
- Authors
- Thigpen, J. T., Brady, M. F., Alvarez, R. D., Adelson, M. D., Homesley, H. D., Manetta, A., Soper, J. T., & Given, F. T.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 1999-06
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1736-1736
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W1933506009
- Cited by
- 484
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 7.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Oral Medroxyprogesterone Acetate in the Treatment of Advanced or Recurrent Endometrial Carcinoma: A Dose-Response Study by the Gynecologic Oncology Group. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.1999.17.6.1736
- The paper
- Thigpen, J. T., Brady, M. F., Alvarez, R. D., Adelson, M. D., Homesley, H. D., Manetta, A., Soper, J. T., & Given, F. T. (1999). Oral Medroxyprogesterone Acetate in the Treatment of Advanced or Recurrent Endometrial Carcinoma: A Dose-Response Study by the Gynecologic Oncology Group. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.1999.17.6.1736
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.