The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Randomized Phase III KEYNOTE-181 Study of Pembrolizumab Versus Chemotherapy in Advanced Esophageal Cancer
Abstract
PURPOSE: Patients with advanced esophageal cancer have a poor prognosis and limited treatment options after first-line chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this open-label, phase III study, we randomly assigned (1:1) 628 patients with advanced/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma of the esophagus, that progressed after one prior therapy, to pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks for up to 2 years or chemotherapy (investigator’s choice of paclitaxel, docetaxel, or irinotecan). Primary end points were overall survival (OS) in patients with programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) combined positive score (CPS) ≥ 10, in patients with squamous cell carcinoma, and in all patients (one-sided α 0.9%, 0.8%, and 0.8%, respectively). RESULTS: At final analysis, conducted 16 months after the last patient was randomly assigned, OS was prolonged with pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy for patients with CPS ≥ 10 (median, 9.3 v 6.7 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.69 [95% CI, 0.52 to 0.93]; P = .0074). Estimated 12-month OS rate was 43% (95% CI, 33.5% to 52.1%) with pembrolizumab versus 20% (95% CI, 13.5% to 28.3%) with chemotherapy. Median OS was 8.2 months versus 7.1 months (HR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.63 to 0.96]; P = .0095) in patients with squamous cell carcinoma and 7.1 months versus 7.1 months (HR, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.75 to 1.05]; P = .0560) in all patients. Grade 3-5 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 18.2% of patients with pembrolizumab versus 40.9% in those who underwent chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: Pembrolizumab prolonged OS versus chemotherapy as second-line therapy for advanced esophageal cancer in patients with PD-L1 CPS ≥ 10, with fewer treatment-related adverse events.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bray, F., Ferlay, J., Soerjomataram, I., Siegel, R. L., Torre, L. A., & Jemal, A. (2018) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.21492 · Cited by 84,109
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- 10.2188/jea.JE20120162 · doi:10.2188/jea.je20120162
- 10.1200/JCO.2014.60.1799 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-16-0520 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/annonc/mdy498 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.09.048 · DOI
- 10.1200/JCO.2017.74.9846 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30181-X · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.5441 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30626-6 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1097/00000421-198212000-00014 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sun, J.-M., Shen, L., Shah, M. A., Enzinger, P., Adenis, A., Doi, T., Kojima, T., Metges, J.-P., Li, Z., Kim, S.-B., et al. (2021) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(21)01234-4 · Cited by 1,635
Self-citationTumor Mutational Burden as a Predictive Biomarker in Solid Tumors
Sha, D., Jin, Z., Budczies, J., Kluck, K., Stenzinger, A., & Sinicrope, F. A. (2020) · Cancer Discovery · doi:10.1158/2159-8290.cd-20-0522 · Cited by 859
Luo, H., Lu, J., Bai, Y., Mao, T., Wang, J., Fan, Q., Zhang, Y., Zhao, K., Chen, Z., Gao, S., et al. (2021) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2021.12836 · Cited by 803
Self-citationOesophageal cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up
Obermannová, R., Alsina, M., Cervantes, A., Leong, T., Lordick, F., Nilsson, M., van Grieken, N. C. T., Vogel, A., & Smyth, E. C. (2022) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.annonc.2022.07.003 · Cited by 730
Self-citationImmune checkpoint therapy for solid tumours: clinical dilemmas and future trends
Sun, Q., Hong, Z., Zhang, C., Wang, L., Han, Z., & Ma, D. (2023) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-023-01522-4 · Cited by 598
Metadata
- Authors
- Kojima, T., Shah, M. A., Muro, K., Francois, E., Adenis, A., Hsu, C.-H., Doi, T., Moriwaki, T., Kim, S.-B., Lee, S.-H., Bennouna, J., Kato, K., Shen, L., Enzinger, P., Qin, S.-K., Ferreira, P., Chen, J., Girotto, G., de la Fouchardiere, C., Senellart, H., Al-Rajabi, R., Lordick, F., Wang, R., Suryawanshi, S., Bhagia, P., Kang, S. P., Metges, J.-P., & on behalf of the KEYNOTE-181 Investigators
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2020-12-10
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 35
- Pages
- 4138-4148
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W3092384992
- Cited by
- 1,126
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 138.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Randomized Phase III KEYNOTE-181 Study of Pembrolizumab Versus Chemotherapy in Advanced Esophageal Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.20.01888
- The paper
- Kojima, T., Shah, M. A., Muro, K., Francois, E., Adenis, A., Hsu, C.-H., Doi, T., Moriwaki, T., Kim, S.-B., Lee, S.-H., Bennouna, J., Kato, K., Shen, L., Enzinger, P., Qin, S.-K., Ferreira, P., Chen, J., Girotto, G., de la Fouchardiere, C., . . . on behalf of the KEYNOTE-181 Investigators. (2020). Randomized Phase III KEYNOTE-181 Study of Pembrolizumab Versus Chemotherapy in Advanced Esophageal Cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.20.01888
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.