The DOI matches its OpenAlex record.
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer: Significantly Enhanced Response With Docetaxel
Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of neoadjuvant (NA) docetaxel (DOC) with anthracycline-based therapy and determine the efficacy of NA DOC in patients with breast cancer initially failing to respond to anthracycline-based NA chemotherapy (CT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with large or locally advanced breast cancer received four pulses of cyclophosphamide 1,000 mg/m(2), doxorubicin 50 mg/m(2), vincristine 1.5 mg/m(2), and prednisolone 40 mg (4 x CVAP) for 5 days. Clinical tumor response was assessed. Those who responded (complete response [CR] or partial response [PR]) were randomized to receive further 4 x CVAP or 4 x DOC (100 mg/m(2)). All nonresponders received 4 x DOC. RESULTS: One hundred sixty-two patients were enrolled; 145 patients completed eight cycles of NA CT. One hundred two patients (66%) achieved a clinical response (PR or CR) after 4 x CVAP. After randomization, 50 patients received 4 x CVAP and 47 patients received 4 x DOC. In patients who received eight cycles of CT, the clinical CR (cCR) and clinical PR (cPR) (94% v 66%) and pathologic CR (pCR) (34% v 16%) response rates were higher (P =.001 and P =.04) in those who received further DOC. Intention-to-treat analysis demonstrated cCR and cPR (85% v 64%; P =.03) and pCR (31% v 15%; P =.06). Axillary lymph node examination revealed residual tumor in 33% of patients who received 8 x CVAP and 38% of patients who received further DOC. In patients who failed to respond to the initial CVAP, 4 x DOC resulted in a cCR and cPR rate of 55% and a pCR rate of 2%. Forty-four percent of these patients had residual tumor within axillary lymph nodes. CONCLUSION: NA DOC resulted in substantial improvement in responses to DOC.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 38
- 10.3322/canjclin.45.4.227 · doi:10.3322/canjclin.45.4.227
- 10.1016/S0305-7372(96)90025-0 · doi:10.1016/s0305-7372(96)90025-0
- 10.1200/JCO.1998.16.8.2672 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/oxfordjournals.annonc.a058929 · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.annonc.a058929
- 10.1016/0959-8049(94)90537-1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/oxfordjournals.annonc.a057953 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1200/JCO.1995.13.12.2879 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3109/07357909809039761 · doi:10.3109/07357909809039761
- Scholl SM, Pierga JY, Asselain B, et al: Breast tumours response to primary chemotherapy predicts local and distant control as well as survival. Eur J Cancer 31A: 1969,1995-1995, · DOI
- 10.1200/JCO.1995.13.3.537 · doi:10.1200/jco.1995.13.3.537
- 10.1016/S0002-9610(97)00279-1 · doi:10.1016/s0002-9610(97)00279-1
- 10.1016/S0959-8049(97)00038-5 · doi:10.1016/s0959-8049(97)00038-5
- 10.1038/bjc.1996.132 · doi:10.1038/bjc.1996.132
- 10.1093/jnci/82.19.1539 · DOI · Paper page
- Ravdin PM: Anthracycline resistance in breast cancer: Clinical applications of current knowledge. Eur J Cancer 31A: S11,1995-S14, (suppl) · doi:10.1016/0959-8049(95)00307-5
- 10.1093/jnci/89.13.902 · doi:10.1093/jnci/89.13.902
- 10.1093/jnci/89.13.917 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0306-3623(95)02013-6 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0959-8049(97)90086-1 · doi:10.1016/s0959-8049(97)90086-1
- 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)11423-4 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0140-6736(92)90997-H · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)03301-7 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0959-8049(97)00260-8 · doi:10.1016/s0959-8049(97)00260-8
- 10.1200/JCO.1995.13.12.2886 · DOI · Paper page
- Wynendaele W, Paridaens R, Van den Bogaert W, et al: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with sequential doxorubicin (DOX) and docetaxel (DOC) in locally advanced breast cancer (LABC): A pilot study. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 18: 106a,1999 (abstr 399) · doi:10.1016/s0959-8049(99)81241-6
- Laurence V, Extra JM, Girre V, et al: Phase II study of sequential docetaxel (Taxotere, TXT) and doxorubicin (DOX) as primary chemotherapy (CT) for large operable breast cancer (BC). Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 18: 98a,1999 (abstr 367) · doi:10.1016/s0959-8049(99)81218-0
- 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.10.3033 · doi:10.1200/jco.1999.17.10.3033
- 10.1002/1097-0142(19810101)47:1<207::AID-CNCR2820470134>3.0.CO;2-6 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/1097-0142(197508)36:2+<627::AID-CNCR2820360803>3.0.CO;2-1 · doi:10.1002/1097-0142(197508)36:2+<627::aid-cncr2820360803>3.0.co;2-1
- 10.1016/S0753-3322(98)80089-9 · doi:10.1016/s0753-3322(98)80089-9
- 10.1097/00000421-199804000-00003 · DOI
- 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.11.3412 · DOI · Paper page
- Raab GH, von Minckwitz G, Blohmer JU, et al: Results of the GEPARDO trial (German preoperative Adriamycin docetaxel): A phase IIB study comparing the combination of dose-intensified Adriamycin and docetaxel with or without tamoxifen in patients with operable breast cancer. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 19: 84a,2000 (abstr 322) · DOI
- 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.2.460 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1097/00000658-199907000-00011 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0002-9610(98)00253-0 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF02303476 · doi:10.1007/bf02303476
- 10.1016/0002-9343(80)90472-6 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Denkert, C., Loibl, S., Noske, A., Roller, M., Müller, B. M., Komor, M., Budczies, J., Darb-Esfahani, S., Kronenwett, R., Hanusch, C., et al. (2010) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2009.23.7370 · Cited by 1,762
Bear, H. D., Anderson, S., Brown, A., Smith, R., Mamounas, E. P., Fisher, B., Margolese, R., Theoret, H., Soran, A., Wickerham, D. L., et al. (2003) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2003.12.005 · Cited by 1,118
Ayers, M., Symmans, W. F., Stec, J., Damokosh, A. I., Clark, E., Hess, K., Lecocke, M., Metivier, J., Booser, D., Ibrahim, N., et al. (2004) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2004.05.166 · Cited by 566
von Minckwitz, G., Raab, G., Caputo, A., Schütte, M., Hilfrich, J., Blohmer, J. U., Gerber, B., Costa, S. D., Merkle, E., Eidtmann, H., et al. (2005) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2005.05.078 · Cited by 417
Anderson, B. O., Shyyan, R., Eniu, A., Smith, R. A., Yip, C.-H., Bese, N. S., Chow, L. W. C., Masood, S., Ramsey, S. D., & Carlson, R. W. (2006) · The Breast Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1075-122x.2006.00199.x · Cited by 359
Metadata
- Authors
- Smith, I. C., Heys, S. D., Hutcheon, A. W., Miller, I. D., Payne, S., Gilbert, F. J., Ah-See, A. K., Eremin, O., Walker, L. G., Sarkar, T. K., Eggleton, S. P., & Ogston, K. N.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2002-03-15
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1456-1466
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2138734774
- Cited by
- 782
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer: Significantly Enhanced Response With Docetaxel. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.20.6.1456
- The paper
- Smith, I. C., Heys, S. D., Hutcheon, A. W., Miller, I. D., Payne, S., Gilbert, F. J., Ah-See, A. K., Eremin, O., Walker, L. G., Sarkar, T. K., Eggleton, S. P., & Ogston, K. N. (2002). Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer: Significantly Enhanced Response With Docetaxel. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.20.6.1456
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.