The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Hepatic Drug Targeting: Phase I Evaluation of Polymer-Bound Doxorubicin
Abstract
PURPOSE: Preclinical studies have shown good anticancer activity following targeting of a polymer bearing doxorubicin with galactosamine (PK2) to the liver. The present phase I study was devised to determine the toxicity, pharmacokinetic profile, and targeting capability of PK2. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Doxorubicin was linked via a lysosomally degradable tetrapeptide sequence to N-(2-hydroxypropyl)methacrylamide copolymers bearing galactosamine. Targeting, toxicity, and efficacy were evaluated in 31 patients with primary (n = 25) or metastatic (n = 6) liver cancer. Body distribution of the radiolabelled polymer conjugate was assessed using gamma-camera imaging and single-photon emission computed tomography. RESULTS: The polymer was administered by intravenous (i.v.) infusion over 1 hour, repeated every 3 weeks. Dose escalation proceeded from 20 to 160 mg/m(2) (doxorubicin equivalents), the maximum-tolerated dose, which was associated with severe fatigue, grade 4 neutropenia, and grade 3 mucositis. Twenty-four hours after administration, 16.9% +/- 3.9% of the administered dose of doxorubicin targeted to the liver and 3.3% +/- 5.6% of dose was delivered to tumor. Doxorubicin-polymer conjugate without galactosamine showed no targeting. Three hepatoma patients showed partial responses, with one in continuing partial remission 47 months after therapy. CONCLUSION: The recommended PK2 dose is 120 mg/m(2), administered every 3 weeks by IV infusion. Liver-specific doxorubicin delivery is achievable using galactosamine-modified polymers, and targeting is also seen in primary hepatocellular tumors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Structure and properties of pharmacologically active polymers
Ringsdorf, H. (1975) · Journal of Polymer Science: Polymer Symposia · doi:10.1002/polc.5070510111 · Cited by 1,094
Stone, P., Richardson, A., Ream, E., Smith, A. G., Kerr, D. J., & Kearney, N. (2000) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1023/a:1008318932641 · Cited by 438
Cited by
Cancer nanomedicine: progress, challenges and opportunities
Shi, J., Kantoff, P. W., Wooster, R., & Farokhzad, O. C. (2017) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc.2016.108 · Cited by 5,873
Nanoparticle therapeutics: an emerging treatment modality for cancer
Davis, M. E., Chen, Z., & Shin, D. M. (2008) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd2614 · Cited by 4,233
Strategies in the design of nanoparticles for therapeutic applications
Petros, R. A., & DeSimone, J. M. (2010) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd2591 · Cited by 3,651
Ligand-targeted therapeutics in anticancer therapy
Allen, T. M. (2002) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc903 · Cited by 1,647
Drug targeting to tumors: Principles, pitfalls and (pre-) clinical progress
Lammers, T., Kiessling, F., Hennink, W. E., & Storm, G. (2012) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2011.09.063 · Cited by 1,324
Metadata
- Authors
- Seymour, L. W., Ferry, D. R., Anderson, D., Hesslewood, S., Julyan, P. J., Poyner, R., Doran, J., Young, A., Burtles, S. S., & Kerr, D. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Publisher
- Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
- Published
- 2002-03-15
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1668-1676
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1978183755
- Cited by
- 435
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hepatic Drug Targeting: Phase I Evaluation of Polymer-Bound Doxorubicin. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.20.6.1668
- The paper
- Seymour, L. W., Ferry, D. R., Anderson, D., Hesslewood, S., Julyan, P. J., Poyner, R., Doran, J., Young, A., Burtles, S. S., & Kerr, D. J. (2002). Hepatic Drug Targeting: Phase I Evaluation of Polymer-Bound Doxorubicin. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.20.6.1668
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.