The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Preoperative Chemotherapy in Primary Operable Breast Cancer: Results From the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Trial 10902
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate whether preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with primary operable breast cancer results in better overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival rates and whether preoperative chemotherapy permits more breast-conserving surgery procedures than postoperative chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Six hundred ninety-eight breast cancer patients (T1c, T2, T3, T4b, N0 to 1, and M0) were enrolled onto a randomized phase III trial that compared four cycles of fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide administered preoperatively versus the same regimen administered postoperatively (the first cycle administered within 36 hours after surgery). Patients were followed up for OS, progression-free survival (PFS), and locoregional recurrence (LRR). RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 56 months, there was no significant difference in terms of OS (hazards ratio, 1.16; P = .38), PFS (hazards ratio, 1.15; P = .27), and time to LRR (hazards ratio, 1.13; P = .61). Fifty-seven patients (23%) were downstaged by the preoperative chemotherapy, whereas 14 patients (18%) underwent mastectomy and not the planned breast-conserving therapy. CONCLUSION: The use of preoperative chemotherapy yields similar results in terms of PFS, OS, and locoregional control compared with conventional postoperative chemotherapy. In addition, preoperative chemotherapy enables more patients to be treated with breast-conserving surgery. Because preoperative chemotherapy does not improve disease outcome compared with postoperative chemotherapy, future trials should involve quality-of-life studies to investigate whether patients will benefit from this treatment modality.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Poulsen, B., Graversen, H. P., Beckmann, J., & Blichert-Toft, M. (1997) · European Journal of Surgical Oncology (EJSO) · doi:10.1016/s0748-7983(97)90804-0 · Cited by 80 · cited 1×
“Q uality-of-life studies, however, have been performed to investigate the effects of breast-conserving therapy versus mastectomy and fail to show a clear benefit for the conservative treatment modality, except for a slightly less impaired body image [46-49].”
Background
Cited by
Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: Recommendations from the EUSOMA working group
Sardanelli, F., Boetes, C., Borisch, B., Decker, T., Federico, M., Gilbert, F. J., Helbich, T., Heywang-Köbrunner, S. H., Kaiser, W. A., Kerin, M. J., et al. (2010) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2010.02.015 · Cited by 992
Mann, R. M., Cho, N., & Moy, L. (2019) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2019182947 · Cited by 917
Hellmann, M. D., Chaft, J. E., William, W. N., Rusch, V., Pisters, K. M. W., Kalhor, N., Pataer, A., Travis, W. D., Swisher, S. G., & Kris, M. G. (2014) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(13)70334-6 · Cited by 646
Guarneri, V., Broglio, K., Kau, S.-W., Cristofanilli, M., Buzdar, A. U., Valero, V., Buchholz, T., Meric, F., Middleton, L., Hortobagyi, G. N., et al. (2006) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2005.02.6914 · Cited by 601
Keam, B., Im, S.-A., Lee, K.-H., Han, S.-W., Oh, D.-Y., Kim, J. H., Lee, S.-H., Han, W., Kim, D.-W., Kim, T.-Y., et al. (2011) · Breast Cancer Research · doi:10.1186/bcr2834 · Cited by 235
Metadata
- Authors
- van der Hage, J. A., van de Velde, C. J. H., Julien, J.-P., Tubiana-Hulin, M., Vandervelden, C., Duchateau, L., & Cooperating Investigators
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2001-11-15
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 4224-4237
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2131915049
- Cited by
- 1,107
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Preoperative Chemotherapy in Primary Operable Breast Cancer: Results From the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Trial 10902. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2001.19.22.4224
- The paper
- van der Hage, J. A., van de Velde, C. J. H., Julien, J.-P., Tubiana-Hulin, M., Vandervelden, C., Duchateau, L., & Cooperating Investigators. (2001). Preoperative Chemotherapy in Primary Operable Breast Cancer: Results From the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Trial 10902. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2001.19.22.4224
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.