Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 322

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Results of Intensive Chemotherapy Followed by Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Rescue in 22 Patients With Refractory or Recurrent Primary CNS Lymphoma or Intraocular Lymphoma

Soussain, Carole, Suzan, Florence, Hoang-Xuan, Khê, Cassoux, Nathalie, Levy, Vincent, Azar, Nabih, Belanger, Coralie, Achour, Eddine, Ribrag, Vincent, Gerber, Sophie, Delattre, Jean-Yves, Leblond, and Véronique·2001·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the feasibility and efficacy of intensive chemotherapy with hematopoietic stem-cell rescue (IC + HCR) in patients with refractory or recurrent primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL) or intraocular lymphoma (IOL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: IC consisted of thiotepa 250 mg/m 2/d days −9 through −7, busulfan 10 mg/kg (total dose) days −6 through −4, and cyclophosphamide 60 mg/kg/d days −3 and −2. Intravenous clonazepam 2 mg/d was given prophylactically from the day before initiation of busulfan therapy to the day after completion of busulfan therapy. Patients with refractory or recurrent PCNSL underwent IC + HCR only if they were chemosensitive to two cycles of salvage treatment with cytarabine (2 g/m 2/d days 2 through 5 and 50 mg/m 2/d days 1 through 5 in a 12-hour infusion) and etoposide (VP-16; 200 mg/m 2/d days 2 through 5) (CYVE). Patients with IOL refractory to high-dose methotrexate (MTX) and cytarabine entered the IC + HCR program directly. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients (10 with relapses, 12 with refractory disease) were enrolled. Twenty patients entered the IC + HCR program: twelve entered after CYVE treatment, seven entered directly, and one had previously been retreated with high-dose MTX. Before IC, eight patients were in complete remission (CR), four were in partial remission (PR), one had stable disease, and seven had refractory disease. After IC + HCR, 16 patients entered CR, two remained in PR, one had stable disease, and one had disease progression. Fourteen patients remained alive (median follow-up time, 41.5 months). The overall probability of survival at 3 years was 63.7%. After IC, that probability was 60% and the 3-year probability of event-free survival was 53%. Seven patients had neurologic adverse events during the entire procedure. CONCLUSION: IC + HCR proved feasible and effective in patients with refractory or recurrent PCNSL or IOL. The entire procedure seemed to be most toxic in patients ≥ 60 years. A prospective multicenter study is ongoing.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2001.19.3.742

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Cited by

See all 322

Metadata

Authors
Soussain, C., Suzan, F., Hoang-Xuan, K., Cassoux, N., Levy, V., Azar, N., Belanger, C., Achour, E., Ribrag, V., Gerber, S., Delattre, J.-Y., & Leblond, A. V.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2001-02-01
Volume
19
Issue
3
Pages
742-749
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W1833666995
Cited by
322
References
7
FWCI
11.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Results of Intensive Chemotherapy Followed by Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Rescue in 22 Patients With Refractory or Recurrent Primary CNS Lymphoma or Intraocular Lymphoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2001.19.3.742
The paper
Soussain, C., Suzan, F., Hoang-Xuan, K., Cassoux, N., Levy, V., Azar, N., Belanger, C., Achour, E., Ribrag, V., Gerber, S., Delattre, J.-Y., & Leblond, A. V. (2001). Results of Intensive Chemotherapy Followed by Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Rescue in 22 Patients With Refractory or Recurrent Primary CNS Lymphoma or Intraocular Lymphoma. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2001.19.3.742

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.