Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 272

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Tamoxifen and Chemotherapy for Axillary Node-Negative, Estrogen Receptor–Negative Breast Cancer: Findings From National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-23

Fisher, Bernard, Anderson, Stewart, Tan-Chiu, Elizabeth, Wolmark, Norman, Wickerham, D. Lawrence, Fisher, Edwin R., Dimitrov, Nikolay V., Atkins, James N., Abramson, Neil, Merajver, Sofia, Romond, Edward H., Kardinal, Carl G., Shibata, Henry R., Margolese, Richard G., Farrar, William B.·2001·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

PURPOSE: Uncertainty about the relative worth of doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (AC) and cyclophosphamide/methotrexate/fluorouracil (CMF), as well as doubt about the propriety of giving tamoxifen (TAM) with chemotherapy to patients with estrogen receptor–negative tumors and negative axillary nodes, prompted the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project to initiate the B-23 study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (n = 2,008) were randomly assigned to CMF plus placebo, CMF plus TAM, AC plus placebo, or AC plus TAM. Six cycles of CMF were given for 6 months; four cycles of AC were administered for 63 days. TAM was given daily for 5 years. Relapse-free survival (RFS), event-free survival (EFS), and survival (S) were determined by using life-table estimates. Tests for heterogeneity of outcome used log-rank statistics and Cox proportional hazards models to detect differences across all groups and according to chemotherapy and hormonal therapy status. RESULTS: No significant difference in RFS, EFS, or S was observed among the four groups through 5 years (P = .96, .8, and .8, respectively), for those aged ≤ 49 years (P = .97, .5, and .9, respectively), or for those aged ≥ 50 years (P = .7, .6, and .6, respectively). A comparison between all CMF- and all AC-treated patients demonstrated no significant differences in RFS (87% at 5 years in both groups, P = .9), EFS (83% and 82%, P = .6), or S (89% and 90%, P = .4). There were no significant differences in RFS, EFS, or S between CMF and AC in patients aged ≤ 49 or ≥ 50 years. No significant difference in any outcome was observed when chemotherapy-treated patients who received placebo were compared with those given TAM. RFS in both groups was 87% (P = .6), 87% in patients aged ≤ 49 (P = .9), and 88% and 87%, respectively (P = .4), in those aged ≥ 50 years. CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference in the outcome of patients who received AC or CMF. TAM with either regimen resulted in no significant advantage over that achieved from chemotherapy alone.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2001.19.4.931

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 30 references

Cited by

See all 272

Metadata

Authors
Fisher, B., Anderson, S., Tan-Chiu, E., Wolmark, N., Wickerham, D. L., Fisher, E. R., Dimitrov, N. V., Atkins, J. N., Abramson, N., Merajver, S., Romond, E. H., Kardinal, C. G., Shibata, H. R., Margolese, R. G., & Farrar, W. B.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2001-02-15
Volume
19
Issue
4
Pages
931-942
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W1876276942
Cited by
272
References
30
FWCI
7.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tamoxifen and Chemotherapy for Axillary Node-Negative, Estrogen Receptor–Negative Breast Cancer: Findings From National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-23. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2001.19.4.931
The paper
Fisher, B., Anderson, S., Tan-Chiu, E., Wolmark, N., Wickerham, D. L., Fisher, E. R., Dimitrov, N. V., Atkins, J. N., Abramson, N., Merajver, S., Romond, E. H., Kardinal, C. G., Shibata, H. R., Margolese, R. G., & Farrar, W. B. (2001). Tamoxifen and Chemotherapy for Axillary Node-Negative, Estrogen Receptor–Negative Breast Cancer: Findings From National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-23. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2001.19.4.931

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.