The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Tamoxifen and Chemotherapy for Axillary Node-Negative, Estrogen Receptor–Negative Breast Cancer: Findings From National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-23
Abstract
PURPOSE: Uncertainty about the relative worth of doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (AC) and cyclophosphamide/methotrexate/fluorouracil (CMF), as well as doubt about the propriety of giving tamoxifen (TAM) with chemotherapy to patients with estrogen receptor–negative tumors and negative axillary nodes, prompted the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project to initiate the B-23 study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (n = 2,008) were randomly assigned to CMF plus placebo, CMF plus TAM, AC plus placebo, or AC plus TAM. Six cycles of CMF were given for 6 months; four cycles of AC were administered for 63 days. TAM was given daily for 5 years. Relapse-free survival (RFS), event-free survival (EFS), and survival (S) were determined by using life-table estimates. Tests for heterogeneity of outcome used log-rank statistics and Cox proportional hazards models to detect differences across all groups and according to chemotherapy and hormonal therapy status. RESULTS: No significant difference in RFS, EFS, or S was observed among the four groups through 5 years (P = .96, .8, and .8, respectively), for those aged ≤ 49 years (P = .97, .5, and .9, respectively), or for those aged ≥ 50 years (P = .7, .6, and .6, respectively). A comparison between all CMF- and all AC-treated patients demonstrated no significant differences in RFS (87% at 5 years in both groups, P = .9), EFS (83% and 82%, P = .6), or S (89% and 90%, P = .4). There were no significant differences in RFS, EFS, or S between CMF and AC in patients aged ≤ 49 or ≥ 50 years. No significant difference in any outcome was observed when chemotherapy-treated patients who received placebo were compared with those given TAM. RFS in both groups was 87% (P = .6), 87% in patients aged ≤ 49 (P = .9), and 88% and 87%, respectively (P = .4), in those aged ≥ 50 years. CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference in the outcome of patients who received AC or CMF. TAM with either regimen resulted in no significant advantage over that achieved from chemotherapy alone.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical Aspects of the Analysis of Data From Retrospective Studies of Disease
(1959) · JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/22.4.719 · Cited by 14,689
Tumor Angiogenesis and Metastasis — Correlation in Invasive Breast Carcinoma
Weidner, N., Semple, J. P., Welch, W. R., & Folkman, J. (1991) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199101033240101 · Cited by 5,627
Tamoxifen for early breast cancer: an overview of the randomised trials
(1998) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(97)11423-4 · Cited by 4,085
Asymptotically Efficient Rank Invariant Test Procedures
Peto, R., & Peto, J. (1972) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General) · doi:10.2307/2344317 · Cited by 3,393
Maximum utilization of the life table method in analyzing survival
Cutler, S. J., & Ederer, F. (1958) · Journal of Chronic Diseases · doi:10.1016/0021-9681(58)90126-7 · Cited by 2,870
Focan, C., Steinberg, S. M., Blichert-Toft, M., Forbes, J., Collins, R. D., Anderson, S., Margreiter, R., Harwood, C. S., Andersen, K., Beighton, G., et al. (1998) · PubMed · Cited by 2,146
Self-citationFisher, B., Costantino, J., Redmond, C., Poisson, R., Bowman, D., Couture, J., Dimitrov, N. V., Wolmark, N., Wickerham, D. L., Fisher, E. R., et al. (1989) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198902233200802 · Cited by 1,464
Self-citationThe pharmacology and clinical uses of tamoxifen
Furr, B. J. A., & Jordan, V. C. (1984) · Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/0163-7258(84)90043-3 · Cited by 864
Testing for Qualitative Interactions between Treatment Effects and Patient Subsets
Gail, M., & Simon, R. (1985) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2530862 · Cited by 651
Fisher, B., Brown, A. M., Dimitrov, N. V., Poisson, R., Redmond, C., Margolese, R. G., Bowman, D., Wolmark, N., Wickerham, D. L., & Kardinal, C. G. (1990) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.1990.8.9.1483 · Cited by 620
Self-citation
Cited by
Nishimura, R., Osako, T., Nishiyama, Y., Tashima, R., Nakano, M., Fujisue, M., Toyozumi, Y., & Arima, N. (2013) · Oncology · doi:10.1159/000353099 · Cited by 13,166
Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group (EBCTCG) (2011) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(11)60993-8 · Cited by 3,075
Cyclophosphamide and cancer: golden anniversary
Emadi, A., Jones, R. J., & Brodsky, R. A. (2009) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/nrclinonc.2009.146 · Cited by 1,050
Cancer Risks for BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers: Results From Prospective Analysis of EMBRACE
Mavaddat, N., Peock, S., Frost, D., Ellis, S., Platte, R., Fineberg, E., Evans, D. G., Izatt, L., Eeles, R. A., Adlard, J., et al. (2013) · JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/djt095 · Cited by 951
(2001) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/93.13.979 · Cited by 893
Metadata
- Authors
- Fisher, B., Anderson, S., Tan-Chiu, E., Wolmark, N., Wickerham, D. L., Fisher, E. R., Dimitrov, N. V., Atkins, J. N., Abramson, N., Merajver, S., Romond, E. H., Kardinal, C. G., Shibata, H. R., Margolese, R. G., & Farrar, W. B.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2001-02-15
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 931-942
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W1876276942
- Cited by
- 272
- References
- 30
- FWCI
- 7.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tamoxifen and Chemotherapy for Axillary Node-Negative, Estrogen Receptor–Negative Breast Cancer: Findings From National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-23. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2001.19.4.931
- The paper
- Fisher, B., Anderson, S., Tan-Chiu, E., Wolmark, N., Wickerham, D. L., Fisher, E. R., Dimitrov, N. V., Atkins, J. N., Abramson, N., Merajver, S., Romond, E. H., Kardinal, C. G., Shibata, H. R., Margolese, R. G., & Farrar, W. B. (2001). Tamoxifen and Chemotherapy for Axillary Node-Negative, Estrogen Receptor–Negative Breast Cancer: Findings From National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-23. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2001.19.4.931
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.