Cited by 651Statistical Methods in Clinical TrialsStatistical Methods and Bayesian InferenceAdvanced Causal Inference Techniques

Testing for Qualitative Interactions between Treatment Effects and Patient Subsets

Gail, M., Simon, R.·1985·Biometrics

Abstract

Evaluation of evidence that treatment efficacy varies substantially among different subsets of patients is an important feature of the analysis of large clinical trials. Qualitative or crossover interactions are said to occur when one treatment is superior for some subsets of patients and the alternative treatment is superior for other subsets. A non-crossover interaction arises when there is variation in the magnitude, but not in the direction, of treatment effects among subsets. Some authors use the term quantitative interaction to mean non-crossover interaction. Non-crossover interactions are usually of less clinical importance than qualitative interactions, which often have major therapeutic significance. A likelihood ratio test is developed to test for qualitative interactions. Exact critical values are determined and tabulated.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2530862

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the 14-study set shifting meta-analysis, the test for qualitative interaction produces a statistically non-significant test statistic Q*=2.56, compared with a critical value of 14.15 for a significance level of 5%.

    “Correspondingly, the test for qualitative interaction (9) produces a statistically non-significant test statistic Q*=2.56, compared with a critical value of 14.15 for a significance level of 5% (Gail and Simon, 1985).”

    From A Re-Evaluation of Random-Effects Meta-Analysis (2009) · cites this paper as Gail and Simon, 1985

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gail, M., & Simon, R.
Venue
Biometrics
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1985-06
Volume
41
Issue
2
Pages
361
ISSN
0006-341X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1988985184
Cited by
651
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 27
FWCI
10.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biometrics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
Keywords
crossover interaction, treatment effect heterogeneity, likelihood ratio test, exact critical values, clinical trials, subgroup analysis, treatment efficacy
MeSH terms
Biometry, Clinical Trials as Topic, Humans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review