Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,081

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Superior Survival With Capecitabine Plus Docetaxel Combination Therapy in Anthracycline-Pretreated Patients With Advanced Breast Cancer: Phase III Trial Results

O’Shaughnessy, Joyce, Miles, David, Vukelja, Svetislava, Moiseyenko, Vladimir, Ayoub, Jean-Pierre, Cervantes, Guadalupe, Fumoleau, Pierre, Jones, Stephen, Lui, Wing-Yiu, Mauriac, Louis, Twelves, Chris, Van Hazel, Guy, Verma, Shailendra, Leonard, Robert·2002·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

PURPOSE: Docetaxel and capecitabine, a tumor-activated oral fluoropyrimidine, show high single-agent efficacy in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and synergy in preclinical studies. This international phase III trial compared efficacy and tolerability of capecitabine/docetaxel therapy with single-agent docetaxel in anthracycline-pretreated patients with MBC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomized to 21-day cycles of oral capecitabine 1,250 mg/m 2 twice daily on days 1 to 14 plus docetaxel 75 mg/m 2 on day 1 (n = 255) or to docetaxel 100 mg/m 2 on day 1 (n = 256). RESULTS: Capecitabine/docetaxel resulted in significantly superior efficacy in time to disease progression (TTP) (hazard ratio, 0.652; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.545 to 0.780; P = .0001; median, 6.1 v 4.2 months), overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.775; 95% CI, 0.634 to 0.947; P = .0126; median, 14.5 v 11.5 months), and objective tumor response rate (42% v 30%, P = .006) compared with docetaxel. Gastrointestinal side effects and hand-foot syndrome were more common with combination therapy, whereas myalgia, arthralgia, and neutropenic fever/sepsis were more common with single-agent docetaxel. More grade 3 adverse events occurred with combination therapy (71% v 49%, respectively), whereas grade 4 events were slightly more common with docetaxel (31% v 25% with combination). CONCLUSION: The significantly superior TTP and survival achieved with the addition of capecitabine to docetaxel 75 mg/m 2, with the manageable toxicity profile, indicate that this combination provides clear benefits over single-agent docetaxel 100 mg/m 2. Docetaxel/capecitabine therapy is an important treatment option for women with anthracycline-pretreated MBC.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2002.09.002

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 1,081

Metadata

Authors
O’Shaughnessy, J., Miles, D., Vukelja, S., Moiseyenko, V., Ayoub, J.-P., Cervantes, G., Fumoleau, P., Jones, S., Lui, W.-Y., Mauriac, L., Twelves, C., Van Hazel, G., Verma, S., & Leonard, R.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2002-06-15
Volume
20
Issue
12
Pages
2812-2823
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2131770017
Cited by
1,081
References
2
FWCI
32.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Superior Survival With Capecitabine Plus Docetaxel Combination Therapy in Anthracycline-Pretreated Patients With Advanced Breast Cancer: Phase III Trial Results. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2002.09.002
The paper
O’Shaughnessy, J., Miles, D., Vukelja, S., Moiseyenko, V., Ayoub, J.-P., Cervantes, G., Fumoleau, P., Jones, S., Lui, W.-Y., Mauriac, L., Twelves, C., Van Hazel, G., Verma, S., & Leonard, R. (2002). Superior Survival With Capecitabine Plus Docetaxel Combination Therapy in Anthracycline-Pretreated Patients With Advanced Breast Cancer: Phase III Trial Results. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2002.09.002

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.