The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quantification of Free Circulating DNA As a Diagnostic Marker in Lung Cancer
Abstract
Purpose: Analysis of circulating DNA in plasma can provide a useful marker for earlier lung cancer detection. This study was designed to assess the sensitivity and specificity of a quantitative molecular assay of circulating DNA to identify patients with lung cancer and monitor their disease. Materials and Methods: The amount of plasma DNA was determined through the use of real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of the human telomerase reverse transcriptase gene (hTERT) in 100 non–small-cell lung cancer patients and 100 age-, sex-, and smoking-matched controls. Screening performance of the assay was calculated through the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Odds ratios were calculated using conditional logistic regression analysis. Results: Median concentration of circulating plasma DNA in patients was almost eight times the value detected incontrols (24.3 v 3.1 ng/mL). The area under the ROC curve was 0.94 (95% CI, 0.907 to 0.973). Plasma DNA was a strong risk factor for lung cancer; concentrations in the upper tertile were associated with an 85-fold higher risk than were those in the lowest tertile. Conclusion: This study shows that higher levels of free circulating DNA can be detected in patients with lung cancer compared with disease-free heavy smokers by a PCR assay, and suggests a new, noninvasive approach for early detection of lung cancer. Levels of plasma DNA could also identify higher-risk individuals for lung cancer screening and chemoprevention trials.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mortality from smoking worldwide
Peto, R., Lopez, A. D., Boreham, J., Thun, M., Heath, C., & Doll, R. (1996) · British Medical Bulletin · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a011519 · Cited by 638
Cited by
Coudray, N., Ocampo, P. S., Sakellaropoulos, T., Narula, N., Snuderl, M., Fenyö, D., Moreira, A. L., Razavian, N., & Tsirigos, A. (2018) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-018-0177-5 · Cited by 2,930
Circulating nucleic acids (CNAs) and cancer—A survey
Fleischhacker, M., & Schmidt, B. (2007) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Reviews on Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.bbcan.2006.10.001 · Cited by 851
Pastorino, U., Rossi, M., Rosato, V., Marchianò, A., Sverzellati, N., Morosi, C., Fabbri, A., Galeone, C., Negri, E., Sozzi, G., et al. (2012) · European Journal of Cancer Prevention · doi:10.1097/cej.0b013e328351e1b6 · Cited by 414
Self-citationCell-free DNA in the blood as a solid tumor biomarker–a critical appraisal of the literature
Jung, K., Fleischhacker, M., & Rabien, A. (2010) · Clinica Chimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.cca.2010.07.032 · Cited by 337
Gorgannezhad, L., Umer, M., Islam, M. N., Nguyen, N.-T., & Shiddiky, M. J. A. (2018) · Lab on a Chip · doi:10.1039/c8lc00100f · Cited by 312
Metadata
- Authors
- Sozzi, G., Conte, D., Leon, M., Cirincione, R., Roz, L., Ratcliffe, C., Roz, E., Cirenei, N., Bellomi, M., Pelosi, G., Pierotti, M. A., & Pastorino, U.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2003-11-01
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 3902-3908
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2120649999
- Cited by
- 552
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantification of Free Circulating DNA As a Diagnostic Marker in Lung Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2003.02.006
- The paper
- Sozzi, G., Conte, D., Leon, M., Cirincione, R., Roz, L., Ratcliffe, C., Roz, E., Cirenei, N., Bellomi, M., Pelosi, G., Pierotti, M. A., & Pastorino, U. (2003). Quantification of Free Circulating DNA As a Diagnostic Marker in Lung Cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2003.02.006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.